Aitken J F, Green A, Eldridge A, Green L, Pfitzner J, Battistutta D, Martin N G
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Br J Cancer. 1994 Mar;69(3):487-91. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.88.
In the course of an investigation of melanocytic naevus development in Queensland, Australia, whole-body naevus counts of 66 adolescents were performed separately by two nurse examiners on two occasions on average 4 weeks apart. There was good agreement between the two examiners for counts of total naevi on the whole body (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.96) and at selected subsites (face, neck, back, upper arms, lower arms). Agreement was lower when raised naevi only were counted (0.83). Intra-examiner repeatability was high for both nurses, particularly for the more experienced examiner (intra-class correlation coefficients = 0.98 and 0.91 for total naevi on the whole body), and was consistently better when all naevi were counted rather than naevi of a particular size. Independent counts of naevi on the back using a computer imaging technique were reproducible (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.92), but showed only moderate agreement with counts by the nurse examiners. Overall, these results demonstrate high comparability of naevus counts between and within similarly trained examiners. They do not support the common practice in epidemiological studies of restricting counts to naevi larger than 2 mm, or of counting raised naevi only.
在澳大利亚昆士兰州对黑素细胞痣发育情况的一项调查过程中,两名护士检查员对66名青少年进行了全身痣计数,平均在相隔4周的两个时间段分别进行。两名检查员对全身痣总数(组内相关系数=0.96)以及选定的子部位(面部、颈部、背部、上臂、下臂)的痣计数结果具有良好的一致性。仅对隆起痣进行计数时,一致性较低(0.83)。两名护士的检查者内部重复性都很高,尤其是经验更丰富的检查员(全身痣总数的组内相关系数分别为0.98和0.91),并且当对所有痣进行计数而非特定大小的痣时,一致性始终更好。使用计算机成像技术对背部的痣进行独立计数具有可重复性(组内相关系数=0.92),但与护士检查员的计数结果仅显示出中等程度的一致性。总体而言,这些结果表明,在受过类似培训的检查员之间以及内部,痣计数具有高度可比性。它们不支持流行病学研究中仅对大于2毫米的痣进行计数或仅对隆起痣进行计数的常见做法。