• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术治疗异常尿路结石:结果分析及与正常尿路的比较

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones in abnormal urinary tracts: analysis of results and comparison with normal urinary tracts.

作者信息

Demirkesen O, Yaycioglu O, Onal B, Kalkan M, Tansu N, Yalcin V, Kural A R, Solok V

机构信息

Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2001 Sep;15(7):681-5. doi: 10.1089/08927790152596235.

DOI:10.1089/08927790152596235
PMID:11697396
Abstract

PURPOSE

We reviewed our experience with SWL for stones in abnormal urinary tracts and compared the results with those in normal urinary tracts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study group was composed of 2566 renal units (RU) treated on the Siemens Lithostar lithotripter at our SWL unit whose treatment and follow-up at 10 to 12 weeks were completed. Sixty-eight RUs (2.7%) belonged to 52 patients who had congenital upper urinary tract abnormalities. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the impact of age, stone size, location, and the type of abnormality on the outcome of the SWL in the abnormal RU. The student t-, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used for the comparison of stone load, number of treatment sessions, catheter placement, and success rates of the patients with normal and abnormal RU. Results of long-term follow-up for available patients (38 RU; 56%) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Age, stone load, stone location, and the type of abnormality did not have a statistically significant impact on the outcome of SWL for abnormal RU. The average stone load was 2.1 +/- 2.8 cm2 in the abnormal and 1.4 +/- 1.3 cm2 in the normal RU. Thus, the stone load was significantly higher in the abnormal RU (P < 0.05). In the abnormal group, 56% of the RU became stone free, 37% had nonobstructive and noninfectious clinically insignificant residual fragments < or = 4 mm (CIRF), and SWL failed in 7%. In the normal group, 78% of the RU became stone-free, 18.5% had CIRF, and SWL failed in 4%. There was no significant difference in the success rates in the groups if success was defined as stone free and CIRF together (P > 0.05). However, there was significant a difference when stone-free, CIRF, and failure rates were evaluated separately (P < 0.05). Recurrence, regrowth, and retreatment rates in abnormal RU were 50%, 37%, and 34%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the fragmentation rates were similar, clearance of the fragments was hampered in abnormal urinary tracts. Thus, especially for large stones, other endourologic treatment options should be considered. High recurrence and regrowth rates warrant careful monitoring and consideration for medical treatment during follow-up.

摘要

目的

我们回顾了体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗异常尿路结石的经验,并将结果与正常尿路结石的治疗结果进行比较。

患者与方法

研究组由在我们的SWL治疗单元接受西门子Lithostar碎石机治疗的2566个肾单位(RU)组成,这些患者的治疗及10至12周的随访已完成。68个RU(2.7%)属于52例患有先天性上尿路异常的患者。进行逻辑回归分析,以分析年龄、结石大小、位置及异常类型对异常RU中SWL治疗结果的影响。采用学生t检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验来比较正常RU和异常RU患者的结石负荷、治疗次数、导管置入情况及成功率。还对可获得长期随访结果的患者(38个RU;56%)进行了评估。

结果

年龄、结石负荷、结石位置及异常类型对异常RU的SWL治疗结果无统计学显著影响。异常RU的平均结石负荷为2.1±2.8 cm²,正常RU为1.4±1.3 cm²。因此,异常RU的结石负荷显著更高(P<0.05)。在异常组中,56%的RU结石清除,37%有非梗阻性、非感染性且临床意义不大的残留碎片≤4 mm(CIRF),7%的SWL治疗失败。在正常组中,78%的RU结石清除,18.5%有CIRF,4%的SWL治疗失败。如果将成功定义为结石清除和CIRF两者,则两组成功率无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,分别评估结石清除率、CIRF率和失败率时存在显著差异(P<0.05)。异常RU的复发率、再生长率和再次治疗率分别为50%、37%和34%。

结论

虽然碎石率相似,但异常尿路中碎片的清除受到阻碍。因此,尤其是对于大结石,应考虑其他腔内泌尿外科治疗选择。高复发率和再生长率需要在随访期间进行仔细监测并考虑药物治疗。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones in abnormal urinary tracts: analysis of results and comparison with normal urinary tracts.体外冲击波碎石术治疗异常尿路结石:结果分析及与正常尿路的比较
J Endourol. 2001 Sep;15(7):681-5. doi: 10.1089/08927790152596235.
2
5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片患者的5年随访
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):860-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.005. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
3
A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar.一种简单的体位,用于在使用西门子Lithostar进行体外冲击波碎石术时,对靠近髂嵴的上段输尿管结石提供更好的成像。
Eur Urol. 2004 Mar;45(3):352-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.012.
4
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the pediatric population.儿科人群中的体外冲击波碎石术。
J Endourol. 1999 Apr;13(3):147-50. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.147.
5
Predictors of success for stone fragmentation and stone-free rate after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石后结石碎裂及结石清除率的成功预测因素。
Urol J. 2012 Summer;9(3):549-52.
6
Do patients on alpha-blockers for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia have better results after shockwave lithotripsy of urinary stones?接受 α 受体阻滞剂治疗良性前列腺增生的患者在接受体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石后效果更好吗?
J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):612-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0630.
7
Experience with EDAP LT02 extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in 1363 patients: comparison with results of LT01 SWL in 1586 patients.1363例患者使用EDAP LT02体外冲击波碎石术的经验:与1586例患者使用LT01体外冲击波碎石术的结果比较。
J Endourol. 1997 Apr;11(2):103-11. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.103.
8
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
9
The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.肾盂肾盏解剖结构对小儿下极结石冲击波碎石术后结石清除的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c.
10
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: twelve years of experience with 2836 patients at a single center.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石:单中心2836例患者的12年经验
Urol J. 2012 Summer;9(3):557-61.

引用本文的文献

1
"Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus other treatments for stone management in horseshoe kidneys: A systematic review".经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与马蹄肾结石治疗的其他方法:一项系统评价
Arab J Urol. 2024 Feb 6;22(4):243-252. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2312699. eCollection 2024.
2
Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review.混合式软性输尿管镜术在肾结石治疗中的应用策略——一篇叙述性综述。
J Med Life. 2022 Aug;15(8):919-926. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0110.
3
The safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal lithiasis in pelvic ectopic kidney: an exploratory pilot study.
迷你经皮肾镜取石术联合逆行肾内手术治疗盆腔异位肾肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项探索性初步研究。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1734-1742. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-77.
4
Minimally invasive treatment of an ectopic kidney stone: a case report and literature review.异位肾结石的微创治疗:一例报告及文献综述
J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4544-4550. doi: 10.1177/0300060519865845. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?我们应如何以及应该如何优化体外冲击波碎石术?
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
6
Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients.冲击波碎石术(SWL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗马蹄肾患者结石病的比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):96-100. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0023.
7
Outcomes of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with anomalous kidneys.逆行性软性输尿管镜检查及激光碎石术治疗肾脏异常患者结石病的疗效
Urolithiasis. 2015 Feb;43(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0713-9. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
8
Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.关于如何进行体外冲击波碎石术以达到最大效果的各个方面。
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):433-46. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0485-z. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
9
Management of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments following Shock Wave Lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片的处理
Adv Urol. 2012;2012:320104. doi: 10.1155/2012/320104. Epub 2012 May 31.