• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术后肾瘢痕的单光子发射计算机断层扫描比较

Comparison by SPECT of renal scars after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

作者信息

Lechevallier E, Siles S, Ortega J C, Coulange C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Timone's Hospital, Marseille, France.

出版信息

J Endourol. 1993 Dec;7(6):465-7. doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.465.

DOI:10.1089/end.1993.7.465
PMID:8124338
Abstract

Some renal calculi are borderline indications for either extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Our purpose was to quantify by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) the parenchymal lesions of these two procedures to make the choice easier. The SPECT study was done before and 30 days after the stone treatment. The scan was carried out 10 hours after injection of 99mTc-DMSA using a GE400 rotative gamma camera, which data were reconstructed in three planes. The local uptake and scar of the treated area were evaluated in 22 patients with symptomatic kidney stones without previous treatment or renal failure. Twelve patients (mean stone size 12 x 9 mm) were treated on a piezoelectric (EDAP LT-01) lithotripter (mean shock wave number 3420), and ten patients (mean stone size 24 x 17 mm) were treated by PCNL (32F Amplatz sheath in a lower calix). There were no complications, and the stone-free rate at day 30 was 50% in both groups. In the ESWL group, all of the kidneys demonstrated a loss of local uptake, whereas 7 of the 10 in the PCNL group did so. In the ESWL group, 4 of the 12 kidneys had a local loss exceeding 4% but only 2 of 10 kidneys in the PCNL group. There were 7 scars in the treated area in the ESWL group and 6 in the PCNL group. Extracorporeal lithotripsy does not seem to be a nontraumatic procedure for the kidney. For stones that would require several sessions of ESWL, the use of PCNL must be preferred.

摘要

一些肾结石对于体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)或经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)来说属于临界适应症。我们的目的是通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)对这两种手术的实质损伤进行量化,以便更轻松地做出选择。SPECT研究在结石治疗前及治疗后30天进行。在注射99mTc - DMSA 10小时后,使用GE400旋转γ相机进行扫描,数据在三个平面重建。对22例有症状的肾结石且未接受过治疗或无肾衰竭的患者,评估治疗区域的局部摄取和瘢痕情况。12例患者(平均结石大小12×9mm)接受了压电式(EDAP LT - 01)碎石机治疗(平均冲击波次数3420),10例患者(平均结石大小24×17mm)接受了PCNL治疗(在较低肾盏使用32F安普瑞鞘)。未出现并发症,两组在第30天时结石清除率均为50%。在ESWL组中,所有肾脏均显示局部摄取减少,而PCNL组10例中有7例如此。在ESWL组中,12例肾脏中有4例局部摄取减少超过4%,而PCNL组10例中只有2例。ESWL组治疗区域有7处瘢痕,PCNL组有6处。体外碎石术对肾脏似乎并非无创手术。对于需要多次ESWL治疗的结石,应优先选择PCNL。

相似文献

1
Comparison by SPECT of renal scars after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术后肾瘢痕的单光子发射计算机断层扫描比较
J Endourol. 1993 Dec;7(6):465-7. doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.465.
2
Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome.体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盏憩室结石:长期疗效
BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):151-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06911.x.
3
Previous open renal surgery increased vascular complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with primary and secondary PCNL and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients: a retrospective study.一项回顾性研究表明,与初次和二次经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)及体外冲击波碎石术患者相比,既往开放性肾脏手术会增加PCNL的血管并发症。
Urol Int. 2013;91(3):331-4. doi: 10.1159/000351968. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
5
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
6
Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?既往体外冲击波碎石术是否会影响经皮肾镜取石术的操作及结果?
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
7
Predictors for kidney stones recurrence following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)或经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后肾结石复发的预测因素。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Mar;95(3):342-8.
8
Kidney stones recurrence and regrowth after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术后肾结石的复发与再生长。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94(9):1077-83.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.
J Pediatr Surg. 1987 Mar;22(3):223-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(87)80333-0.
10
Treatment of staghorn calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Urology. 1991 Aug;38(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(05)80076-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mean Changes in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Having Renal Stone Disease.患有肾结石疾病并接受经皮肾镜取石术患者的估计肾小球滤过率的平均变化
Cureus. 2021 Feb 13;13(2):e13328. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13328.
2
Does percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its outcomes have an impact on renal function? Quantitative analysis using SPECT-CT DMSA.经皮肾镜取石术及其结果对肾功能有影响吗?使用SPECT-CT DMSA的定量分析。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Oct;42(5):461-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0693-9. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
3
Protocol-based metabolic evaluation in high-risk patients with renal stones in North India.
印度北部高危肾结石患者基于方案的代谢评估。
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Mar;16(2):283-7. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.93754.
4
A chronic outcome of shock wave lithotripsy is parenchymal fibrosis.冲击波碎石术的一个慢性后果是实质纤维化。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):301-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0297-y. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
5
Which efficiency index for urinary stones treatment?治疗尿路结石的效率指标是哪一个?
Urol Res. 2009 Aug;37(4):237-9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-009-0200-x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model.体外冲击波碎石术 60 次/分钟可减少猪模型的肾损伤。
BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(7):1004-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08520.x. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
7
Long-term effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal morphology and arterial vascular resistance as evaluated by color Doppler ultrasonography: preliminary report.经皮肾镜取石术对肾脏形态及动脉血管阻力的长期影响:彩色多普勒超声评估的初步报告
Urol Res. 2006 Jun;34(3):178-83. doi: 10.1007/s00240-006-0038-4. Epub 2006 Jan 25.