Lachs M S, Berkman L, Fulmer T, Horwitz R I
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510-8025.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Feb;42(2):169-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04947.x.
To identify risk factors for the investigation of elder abuse, neglect, self-neglect, exploitation, and abandonment in a population-based observational cohort of community living elders.
Population-based sample of 2,812 community-living men and women in New Haven, Connecticut who were over age 65 in 1982.
Matching process whereby cohort members who were investigated by Connecticut's State Ombudsman on Aging in 1985 or 1986 were identified.
Relative risks for ombudsman investigation in 1985 or 1986 were calculated based on risk factors status at baseline interview in 1982.
Sixty-eight (2.4%) members of the cohort received investigation. Features at cohort entry significantly associated with investigation in multiple logistic regression included: requiring assistance with feeding (Adjusted OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2, 11.7), being a minority elder (Adj. OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4, 2.8), over age 75 at cohort inception (Adj. OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1, 3.1), and having a poor social network as defined by a social network index (Adj. OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0, 2.7). When stratified by race, requiring assistance with feeding was associated with ombudsman investigation in minority elders (Adj. OR 10.8, 95% CI 2.8, 40.5) but not non-minority elders (Adj. OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5, 7.5).
Functional disability, minority status, older age, and poor social networks were associated with investigation for elder mistreatment in this prospective, community-based population of men and women over the age of 65.
在一个以社区为基础的老年人群观察队列中,确定针对老年人虐待、忽视、自我忽视、剥削和遗弃进行调查的风险因素。
1982年在康涅狄格州纽黑文市抽取的2812名65岁以上社区居住男性和女性的基于人群的样本。
通过匹配过程确定1985年或1986年接受康涅狄格州老龄问题监察员调查的队列成员。
根据1982年基线访谈时的风险因素状况,计算1985年或1986年监察员调查的相对风险。
该队列中有68名(2.4%)成员接受了调查。在多因素逻辑回归中,与调查显著相关的队列进入时的特征包括:进食需要帮助(调整后的比值比为3.5,95%可信区间为1.2,11.7)、属于少数族裔老年人(调整后的比值比为2.3,95%可信区间为1.4,2.8)、队列开始时年龄超过75岁(调整后的比值比为1.9,95%可信区间为1.1,3.1)以及社交网络指数定义的社交网络较差(调整后的比值比为1.7,95%可信区间为1.0,2.7)。按种族分层时,进食需要帮助与少数族裔老年人的监察员调查相关(调整后的比值比为10.8,95%可信区间为2.8,40.5),但与非少数族裔老年人无关(调整后的比值比为1.1,95%可信区间为0.5,7.5)。
在这个基于社区的65岁以上男性和女性前瞻性人群中,功能残疾、少数族裔身份、高龄和社交网络较差与老年人虐待调查相关。