Ressink H W, de Boer J E
Dev Biol Stand. 1975;30:88-92.
Comparison of the features of the Hepanosticon, micro-Hepanosticon and Auscell techniques. The serum of 17,000 blood donors of the Amsterdam Blood Bank were tested. Using the micro-Hepanosticon method, 4.5% were false positive with fresh serum, but only 1.5% when the sera were frozen and stored before testing. The authors conclude that the agar gel diffusion, the hemagglutination-inhibition and the Austria II techniques are the most specific, although 1.5% false-positive results must be accepted. The micro-Hepanosticon method offers the great advantage of being the most economical.
肝吸附试验、微量肝吸附试验和听诊技术特点的比较。对阿姆斯特丹血库17000名献血者的血清进行了检测。使用微量肝吸附试验方法，新鲜血清的假阳性率为4.5%，但血清在检测前冷冻保存时假阳性率仅为1.5%。作者得出结论，琼脂凝胶扩散、血凝抑制和奥地利II技术是最具特异性的，尽管必须接受1.5%的假阳性结果。微量肝吸附试验方法具有最经济的巨大优势。
