Fumagalli I, Hammer B
Gastroenterology FMH, Locarno, Switzerland.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994 Jan;29(1):33-7. doi: 10.3109/00365529409090434.
The efficacy and tolerability of cisapride (5 mg three times daily) and metoclopramide (10 mg three times daily) were evaluated in a randomized double-blind trial in patients with functional dyspepsia. Sixty patients, equally distributed in the two groups, entered the trial. After 4 weeks of treatment there was a significant improvement of symptom severity versus base line (p < 0.001) in both groups. The percentage of responders (with no or only mild symptoms) was 87% in the cisapride group and 77% in the metoclopramide group (no statistically significant intergroup difference). At the follow-up visit 2 weeks after completion of the trial this response rate was significantly higher in the cisapride group (73%) than in the metoclopramide group (47%) (p < 0.05). Four of the patients receiving cisapride and 2 of the patients receiving metoclopramide reported adverse events. On assessment of extrapyrimidal symptoms, relevant clinical values were found in one patient receiving metoclopramide. Increased prolactin concentrations were observed in seven patients of the metoclopramide group versus only 1 of the cisapride group (p < 0.05). The present data indicate that during the 2 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with functional dyspepsia, cisapride may result in a better, more sustained overall response when compared with metoclopramide.
在一项针对功能性消化不良患者的随机双盲试验中,评估了西沙必利(每日三次,每次5毫克)和甲氧氯普胺(每日三次,每次10毫克)的疗效和耐受性。60名患者平均分为两组进入试验。治疗4周后,两组患者的症状严重程度与基线相比均有显著改善(p<0.001)。西沙必利组的有效率(无或仅有轻微症状)为87%,甲氧氯普胺组为77%(组间差异无统计学意义)。在试验结束后2周的随访中,西沙必利组的有效率(73%)显著高于甲氧氯普胺组(47%)(p<0.05)。接受西沙必利治疗的患者中有4例、接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者中有2例报告了不良事件。在评估锥体外系症状时,在一名接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者中发现了相关临床值。甲氧氯普胺组有7名患者催乳素浓度升高,而西沙必利组只有1名患者(p<0.05)。目前的数据表明,在功能性消化不良患者治疗结束后的2周内,与甲氧氯普胺相比,西沙必利可能会产生更好、更持久的总体反应。