• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西沙必利治疗普通门诊功能性消化不良:一项安慰剂对照、随机、双盲研究。

Cisapride in functional dyspepsia in general practice. A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

de Groot G H, de Both P S

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Feb;11(1):193-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.117288000.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.117288000.x
PMID:9042993
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia is recognized as a common disorder in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and adverse effects of cisapride compared to a placebo in patients from a general practice with functional dyspepsia (FD). Secondly we investigated whether Helicobacter pylori-positive FD patients present with specific symptoms and determined the efficacy of cisapride for FD patients with H. pylori.

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled double-blind study, patients were randomized to receive fixed doses of either cisapride (10 mg three times daily) or placebo. Symptoms were evaluated after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. The selection of FD patients,collection of data, and evaluation of symptoms as well as adverse effects were performed by general practitioners. Dyspeptic patients were referred to the Gastroenterology Department in order to exclude ulcers, oesophagitis, pancreatitis and gallstones. Biopsies of gastric mucosa were taken for histological examination and H. pylori culture.

PATIENTS

121 patients entered this study (61 took cisapride, 60 placebo). There were 113 patients (56 cisapride, 57 placebo) available for analysis of the efficacy and 120 patients (61 cisapride, 59 placebo) for evaluation of adverse effects.In total 102 biopsies were tested for the presence of gastritis by histological examination. There were 30 H. pylori-positive cultures among 111 patients.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks a statistically significant reduction in symptoms was found, but it was similar in the two groups. No symptoms specific for H. pylori-positive patients were found. There was not a significant difference in the response to cisapride between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. The difference in overall (63%) response in the cisapride group and the 44% response in the placebo group did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found between placebo and cisapride in the treatment of FD in general practice. H. pylori-positive patients did not present with specific symptoms nor did they exhibit a different response to cisapride.

摘要

背景

功能性消化不良在临床实践中被认为是一种常见疾病。本研究的目的是确定西沙必利与安慰剂相比,对普通诊所中功能性消化不良(FD)患者的疗效和不良反应。其次,我们调查了幽门螺杆菌阳性的FD患者是否有特定症状,并确定了西沙必利对幽门螺杆菌阳性的FD患者的疗效。

方法

在一项安慰剂对照双盲研究中,患者被随机分配接受固定剂量的西沙必利(每日三次,每次10毫克)或安慰剂。治疗2周和4周后评估症状。FD患者的选择、数据收集、症状评估以及不良反应评估均由全科医生进行。消化不良患者被转诊至胃肠病科以排除溃疡、食管炎、胰腺炎和胆结石。取胃黏膜活检进行组织学检查和幽门螺杆菌培养。

患者

121名患者进入本研究(61名服用西沙必利,60名服用安慰剂)。有113名患者(56名服用西沙必利,57名服用安慰剂)可用于疗效分析,120名患者(61名服用西沙必利,59名服用安慰剂)可用于不良反应评估。总共对102份活检组织进行了组织学检查以检测胃炎的存在。111名患者中有30份幽门螺杆菌培养阳性。

结果

4周后发现症状有统计学意义的减轻,但两组相似。未发现幽门螺杆菌阳性患者的特定症状。幽门螺杆菌阳性和阴性患者对西沙必利的反应没有显著差异。西沙必利组总体反应率(63%)与安慰剂组反应率(44%)之间的差异未达到统计学意义。

结论

在普通诊所治疗FD时,安慰剂和西沙必利之间未发现显著差异。幽门螺杆菌阳性患者没有特定症状,对西沙必利的反应也没有不同。

相似文献

1
Cisapride in functional dyspepsia in general practice. A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study.西沙必利治疗普通门诊功能性消化不良:一项安慰剂对照、随机、双盲研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Feb;11(1):193-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.117288000.x.
2
Effect of cisapride on functional dyspepsia in patients with and without histological gastritis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.西沙必利对伴有和不伴有组织学胃炎的功能性消化不良患者的影响:一项双盲安慰剂对照试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Jan;12(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1997.tb00338.x.
3
Efficacy of cisapride therapy in functional dyspepsia.西沙必利治疗功能性消化不良的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Apr;9(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00364.x.
4
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cisapride in Saudi Arabs with functional dyspepsia.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995 Jun;30(6):531-4. doi: 10.3109/00365529509089785.
5
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents ulcer development in patients with ulcer-like functional dyspepsia.根除幽门螺杆菌可预防溃疡样功能性消化不良患者发生溃疡。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Feb;15(2):195-201. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00903.x.
6
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial with 12 months' follow up. The Optimal Regimen Cures Helicobacter Induced Dyspepsia (ORCHID) Study Group.根除幽门螺杆菌治疗功能性消化不良:一项为期12个月随访的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。最佳方案治愈幽门螺杆菌所致消化不良(ORCHID)研究组。
BMJ. 1999 Mar 27;318(7187):833-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7187.833.
7
A double-blind randomized study of cisapride in the treatment of nonulcer dyspepsia. The Canadian Cisapride Nud Study Group.西沙必利治疗非溃疡性消化不良的双盲随机研究。加拿大西沙必利非溃疡性消化不良研究组。
Can J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;11(2):127-34. doi: 10.1155/1997/314839.
8
Cisapride versus metoclopramide in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. A double-blind comparative trial.西沙必利与甲氧氯普胺治疗功能性消化不良的双盲对照试验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994 Jan;29(1):33-7. doi: 10.3109/00365529409090434.
9
Cisapride in functional dyspepsia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial in general practice patients.西沙必利治疗功能性消化不良:一项针对全科门诊患者的双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验。
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1993;195:5-10. doi: 10.3109/00365529309098322.
10
Primary prevention of diclofenac associated ulcers and dyspepsia by omeprazole or triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori positive patients: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial.奥美拉唑或三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌阳性患者双氯芬酸相关溃疡和消化不良的一级预防:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验
Gut. 2002 Sep;51(3):329-35. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.3.329.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of Various Pharmacological Interventions in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: A Network Meta-Analysis.各种药物干预治疗功能性消化不良的疗效比较:网络荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jan;67(1):187-207. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06846-1. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Efficacy of serotonin receptor agonists in the treatment of functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis.5-羟色胺受体激动剂治疗功能性消化不良的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan;15(1):23-32. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.69234. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia.
用于功能性消化不良的促动力药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 18;10(10):CD009431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009431.pub3.
4
ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia.ACG 和 CAG 临床指南:消化不良的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):988-1013. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.154. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Drug treatment of functional dyspepsia.功能性消化不良的药物治疗
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 May 7;12(17):2694-700. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2694.
6
Role of cognitive factors in symptom induction following high and low fat meals in patients with functional dyspepsia.认知因素在功能性消化不良患者高脂和低脂餐后症状诱发中的作用。
Gut. 2003 Oct;52(10):1414-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.10.1414.
7
Serotonergic modulating drugs for functional gastrointestinal diseases.用于功能性胃肠疾病的5-羟色胺能调节药物。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Jul;54(1):11-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01612.x.
8
H(2) receptor antagonists and prokinetics in dyspepsia: a critical review.消化不良中H2受体拮抗剂和促动力药:一篇批判性综述
Gut. 2002 May;50 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv58-62. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_4.iv58.