Hett D A, Geraghty I F, Radford R, House J R
Department of Anaesthesia, Southampton General Hospital.
Anaesthesia. 1994 Feb;49(2):157-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03377.x.
Two techniques of pre-oxygenation were studied by continuous analysis of respired gases using a mass spectrometer in 10 healthy volunteers. The first was a conventional technique as commonly used in anaesthesia with a Bain system and tightly-fitting anaesthetic face-mask and an oxygen flow of 8 l.min-1. The second technique also used a Bain system with an oxygen flow of 8 l.min-1, but with a Hudson mask attached. The mean fractional end-tidal oxygen concentrations after 3 min were 0.812 and 0.46 respectively for each of the pre-oxygenation techniques against 0.16 for subjects breathing air. This represents a considerable increase in pulmonary oxygen reserve for both techniques. The second technique is not an alternative to conventional pre-oxygenation for emergency anaesthesia, but is a useful and simple method that is acceptable to both patient and anaesthetist in routine cases.
在10名健康志愿者中,通过使用质谱仪持续分析呼出气体,对两种预给氧技术进行了研究。第一种是麻醉中常用的传统技术,采用贝恩系统、紧密贴合的麻醉面罩,氧气流量为8升/分钟。第二种技术也使用贝恩系统,氧气流量为8升/分钟,但附有哈德森面罩。两种预给氧技术在3分钟后的平均呼气末氧分数浓度分别为0.812和0.46,而呼吸空气的受试者为0.16。这表明两种技术的肺氧储备都有显著增加。第二种技术并非紧急麻醉中传统预给氧的替代方法,但在常规病例中是一种患者和麻醉医生都能接受的有用且简单的方法。