• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁选择预付式医疗服务:三项新预付计划两次营销活动的调查结果

Who chooses prepaid medical care: Survey results from two marketings of three new prepayment plans.

作者信息

Roghmann K J, Gavett J W, Sorensen A A, Wells S, Wersinger R

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1975 Nov-Dec;90(6):516-27.

PMID:813263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1438253/
Abstract

Employees joining or not joining three newly marketed prepayment plans were surveyed during the first marketing period and during another open enrollment period 18 months later. In the 1973 survey the respondents were 149 subscribers (family contracts covering 568 persons) to the new plans and 224 nonjoiners (a total of 802 persons in their families)--all employees of Rochester's largest industry. In the 1975 survey the respondents were employees of several companies. They included 326 joiner families (1,101 persons) and 145 nonjoiner families (483 persons). There were no significant differences in previous out-of-pocket health expenditures between joiners and nonjoiners. Their self-reported health ratings did not differ; disability over the last 2 weeks was about the same. Physician utilization rates and inpatient rates were similar, except for the spouses of subscribers to one plan. However, the joiners were younger, had lived in Rochester for a shorter period, and had made less use of physicians in private practice. The three prepayment plans appealed to different population groups. The Network joiners were young, low-income families, mostly from the city. The Group Health joiners were young families with few children who especially valued availability, accessibility, and comprehensiveness. Health Watch joiners were older couples who preferred to use the traditional avenues to health care.

摘要

在首个营销期以及18个月后的另一个开放注册期,对加入或未加入三项新推出的预付费计划的员工进行了调查。在1973年的调查中,受访者包括149名新计划的订阅者(涵盖568人的家庭合同)和224名未加入者(其家庭共有802人),他们都是罗切斯特最大行业的员工。在1975年的调查中,受访者是几家公司的员工,包括326个加入计划的家庭(1101人)和145个未加入计划的家庭(483人)。加入者和未加入者之前的自付医疗费用没有显著差异。他们自我报告的健康评级没有差异;过去两周的残疾情况大致相同。除了一项计划的订阅者的配偶外,医生利用率和住院率相似。然而,加入者更年轻,在罗切斯特居住的时间更短,并且较少使用私人执业医生。这三项预付费计划吸引了不同的人群。网络计划的加入者是年轻的低收入家庭,大多来自城市。团体健康计划的加入者是孩子较少的年轻家庭,他们特别看重可及性、便利性和全面性。健康观察计划的加入者是年长的夫妇,他们更喜欢通过传统途径获得医疗保健服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/187d/1438253/abb2b109b1c8/pubhealthrep00157-0039-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/187d/1438253/eba8e0d0888e/pubhealthrep00157-0039-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/187d/1438253/abb2b109b1c8/pubhealthrep00157-0039-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/187d/1438253/eba8e0d0888e/pubhealthrep00157-0039-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/187d/1438253/abb2b109b1c8/pubhealthrep00157-0039-b.jpg

相似文献

1
Who chooses prepaid medical care: Survey results from two marketings of three new prepayment plans.谁选择预付式医疗服务:三项新预付计划两次营销活动的调查结果
Public Health Rep. 1975 Nov-Dec;90(6):516-27.
2
Enrollment choice in a mutli-HMO setting:the roles of health risk, financial vulnerability, and access to care.
Med Care. 1977 Feb;15(2):95-114.
3
A profile of children with disabilities receiving SSI: highlights from the National Survey of SSI Children and Families.领取补充保障收入的残疾儿童概况:来自全国补充保障收入儿童与家庭调查的要点
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(2):21-48.
4
The evolution of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in New York: changing program features and enrollee characteristics.纽约州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的发展:项目特征与参保人特点的变化
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e542.
5
Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans.保费、共付额和健康状况对健康保险计划选择的影响。
Med Care. 2008 Oct;46(10):1033-40. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdac.
6
No exit? The effect of health status on dissatisfaction and disenrollment from health plans.无路可退?健康状况对健康保险计划不满及退出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):547-76.
7
Workers who decline employment-related health insurance.拒绝参加与工作相关的健康保险的员工。
Med Care. 2006 May;44(5 Suppl):I12-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000208168.01349.f3.
8
Group premiums in micro health insurance experiences from Tanzania.坦桑尼亚小额健康保险案例中的团体保费。
East Afr J Public Health. 2007 Apr;4(1):28-32.
9
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
10
Out-of-pocket health expenses for Medicaid and other poor and near-poor persons in 1980.1980年医疗补助计划及其他贫困和接近贫困人群的自付医疗费用。
Natl Med Care Util Expend Surv B. 1985 Aug(4):1-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Health care expenditures after introduction of a gatekeeper and a global budget in a Swiss health insurance plan.瑞士医疗保险计划引入守门人制度和总预算后的医疗保健支出。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):370-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.6.370.
2
HMO enrollment projection process and a proposed linear model.健康维护组织(HMO)参保人数预测过程及一个拟议的线性模型。
J Med Syst. 1982 Apr;6(2):131-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00997047.
3
Measuring consumer preferences for ambulatory medical care arrangements.衡量消费者对门诊医疗安排的偏好。

本文引用的文献

1
PATIENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP MEDICAL CARE. A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF STUDIES ON CHOICE AND UTILIZATION OF PREPAID GROUP PRACTICE PLANS.患者对团体医疗护理的看法:对预付费团体医疗实践计划选择与使用研究的综述与分析
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964 Jun;54(6):880-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.54.6.880.
2
EFFECT OF PREPAID GROUP PRACTICE ON HOSPITAL USE.预付费团体医疗模式对医院利用情况的影响。
Public Health Rep (1896). 1963 Nov;78(11):955-65.
3
Who enrolls in a prepaid group practice: the Columbia experience.谁加入了预付制团体医疗模式:哥伦比亚大学的经验。
J Med Syst. 1983 Dec;7(6):545-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00995184.
4
Paying general practitioners: shedding light on the review of health services.支付全科医生薪酬:揭示医疗服务审查情况
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Mar;39(320):114-7.
Johns Hopkins Med J. 1971 Jan;128(1):9-14.
4
Prepaid group health practice in a new community.新社区中的预付费团体医疗实践。
J Health Soc Behav. 1973 Dec;14(4):362-8.
5
The impact of the Rochester Neighborhood Health Center on hospitalization of children, 1968 to 1970.罗切斯特社区健康中心对1968年至1970年儿童住院情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 1973 May;51(5):833-9.
6
HMO performance: the recent evidence.健康维护组织(HMO)的绩效:近期证据
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Summer;51(3):271-317.