Melikyan G B, Niles W D, Cohen F S
Department of Physiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 60612.
J Gen Physiol. 1993 Dec;102(6):1151-70. doi: 10.1085/jgp.102.6.1151.
Cells expressing the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) fuse to planar bilayer membranes under acidic conditions. After an electrically quiescent perfusion stage (Q), a fusion pore forms that enlarges in three subsequent stages. A repetitively flickering pore stage (R) develops into a securely open stage (S) that exhibits conductances ranging from a few to tens of nS. The pore then expands to a terminal stage (T) with a large conductance on the order of one microSiemens. We have studied how virus strain, HA receptors in the target bilayer membrane, and cytoskeleton affect the time a fusion pore remains in each stage. These intervals are referred to as waiting times. In the quiescent stage, waiting times were very sensitive to the virus strain and presence of gangliosides (HA receptors) in the bilayer. When bilayers contained gangliosides, the waiting times in the Q stage for cells infected with the PR/8/34 strain of virus were exponentially distributed, whereas waiting times for cells infected with the Japan/305/57 strain were not so distributed. Without gangliosides, the waiting time distribution for PR/8/34 infected cells was complex. The waiting times in the R and S stages of pore growth were exponentially distributed under all tested conditions. Within the R stage, we analyzed the kinetics of the flickering pore by fitting the open and closed time distributions with a sum of two exponentials. Neither the open and closed time distributions nor the flickering pore conductance distributions were appreciably affected by virus strain or gangliosides. Colchicine and cytochalasin B increased the flicker rates, without affecting the waiting time in the R stage. We conclude that variations in amino acid sequences of the HAs and the presence of gangliosides as receptors within the target membrane critically affect the kinetics of fusion pore formation, but do not affect subsequent stages.
表达流感病毒血凝素(HA)的细胞在酸性条件下与平面双层膜融合。在电静止灌注阶段(Q)之后,形成一个融合孔,该融合孔在随后的三个阶段中扩大。重复闪烁的孔阶段(R)发展为安全开放阶段(S),其电导范围从几纳西门子到几十纳西门子。然后,孔扩展到终末阶段(T),电导大约为一微西门子。我们研究了病毒株、靶双层膜中的HA受体和细胞骨架如何影响融合孔在每个阶段的停留时间。这些间隔被称为等待时间。在静止阶段,等待时间对病毒株和双层膜中神经节苷脂(HA受体)的存在非常敏感。当双层膜含有神经节苷脂时,感染PR/8/34病毒株的细胞在Q阶段的等待时间呈指数分布,而感染Japan/305/57病毒株的细胞的等待时间则不是这样分布。没有神经节苷脂时,PR/8/34感染细胞的等待时间分布很复杂。在所有测试条件下,孔生长的R和S阶段的等待时间呈指数分布。在R阶段内,我们通过用两个指数之和拟合开放和关闭时间分布来分析闪烁孔的动力学。开放和关闭时间分布以及闪烁孔电导分布均未受到病毒株或神经节苷脂的明显影响。秋水仙碱和细胞松弛素B增加了闪烁速率,但不影响R阶段的等待时间。我们得出结论,HA氨基酸序列的变化以及靶膜中作为受体的神经节苷脂的存在严重影响融合孔形成的动力学,但不影响后续阶段。