Drozda D J, Allen S R, Turner A M, Slusher J A, McCain G C
Diabetes Educ. 1993 Sep-Oct;19(5):393-5. doi: 10.1177/014572179301900505.
The effectiveness of an enhanced preparation intervention was compared with the standard preparation intervention for accuracy in overnight urine specimen collections. The sample consisted of 179 individuals with type I insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Subjects were assigned randomly to an enhanced or standard preparation group. The enhanced preparation included written instructions, a reminder to post instructions in the bathroom, a toilet seat cover with a reminder to save urine, and a nurse-initiated telephone call to review the instructions. The standard preparation included written instructions and a telephone number to call with any questions. For subjects without previous collection experience, significantly fewer inaccurate collections were reported in the enhanced preparation group than in the standard group (chi 2 = 4.61, P < .05). There were no differences in collection accuracy between enhanced and standard groups for subjects with collection experience (chi 2 = .4598, P > .05).
为了比较强化准备干预措施与标准准备干预措施在过夜尿液标本采集准确性方面的效果,选取了179名I型胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者作为样本。受试者被随机分配到强化准备组或标准准备组。强化准备措施包括书面说明、在浴室张贴说明的提醒、带有保存尿液提醒的马桶座圈以及护士发起的电话以复查说明。标准准备措施包括书面说明和一个可致电咨询任何问题的电话号码。对于没有既往采集经验的受试者,强化准备组报告的不准确采集情况显著少于标准组(卡方检验=4.61,P<.05)。对于有采集经验的受试者,强化组和标准组在采集准确性方面没有差异(卡方检验=.4598,P>.05)。