Bowe C M, Hildebrand C
Department of Neurology, University of California at Davis, Sacramento.
J Neurol Sci. 1993 Dec 15;120(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90266-2.
Developing and regenerated myelinated rat dorsal and ventral root fibers respond differently to the fast potassium channel blocking agent 4-aminopyridine (4-AP). To pursue this issue further, we made unilateral sciatic nerve crushes in adult rats. Sural (SN) and lateral gastrocnemius (LGN) nerve branches were collected 4-6 months later, for physiological and morphological examination. Regenerated and control nerves in Ringers solution showed generally similar compound action potential (CAP) waveforms, but CAPs of regenerated SNs and LGNs in 4-AP were markedly different. While regenerated SNs showed a prominent late CAP negativity with a "rippled" appearance and markedly compromised recovery properties, the CAP and recovery properties of regenerated LGNs were minimally changed. Light and electron microscopic examination of SN and LGN fibers failed to reveal any features obviously related to the observed physiological differences. We conclude, that the effect of 4-AP on regenerated cutaneous afferents differs from its action on regenerated muscular afferents and efferents. This physiological diversity lacks obvious structural correlates.
发育中和再生的有髓大鼠背根和腹根纤维对快速钾通道阻断剂4-氨基吡啶(4-AP)的反应不同。为了进一步探讨这个问题,我们对成年大鼠进行了单侧坐骨神经挤压。4-6个月后收集腓肠神经(SN)和外侧腓肠肌神经(LGN)分支,进行生理和形态学检查。在林格氏液中的再生神经和对照神经通常显示出相似的复合动作电位(CAP)波形,但4-AP中再生的SN和LGN的CAP明显不同。虽然再生的SN显示出明显突出的晚期CAP负向波,呈“波纹状”外观,恢复特性明显受损,但再生LGN的CAP和恢复特性变化很小。对SN和LGN纤维进行光镜和电镜检查,未发现任何与观察到的生理差异明显相关的特征。我们得出结论,4-AP对再生皮肤传入神经的作用与其对再生肌肉传入神经和传出神经的作用不同。这种生理多样性缺乏明显的结构相关性。