Uyl-de Groot C A, Rutten F F, Bonsel G J
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment/Institute for Health Care Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80030-9.
In the economic evaluation (EE) of technologies in cancer treatment at least three endpoints are relevant: costs, survival and quality of life (QoL). This article is focused on QoL. EE requires the use of generic and valuation QoL instruments at a disease non-specific level, but the inclusion of cancer-specific instruments may be advisable, particularly for reasons of explanation if changes in dimensions are small or conflicting. Given the pros and cons of the available questionnaires, we advocate the use of the Nottingham Health Profile, the EuroQol and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. In our experience the QoL issue in EE linked with cancer trials is associated with practical problems like questionnaire composition, follow-up time, interviewing schedule, patients' compliance and doctors' acceptance. These problems are discussed and some practical guidelines for the design of QoL measurement in cancer trials are given.
在癌症治疗技术的经济评估(EE)中,至少有三个终点是相关的:成本、生存率和生活质量(QoL)。本文重点关注生活质量。经济评估要求在疾病非特异性层面使用通用和评估生活质量的工具,但纳入癌症特异性工具可能是可取的,特别是如果维度变化很小或相互矛盾,出于解释原因尤其如此。考虑到现有问卷的优缺点,我们提倡使用诺丁汉健康量表、欧洲五维度健康量表和鹿特丹症状清单。根据我们的经验,与癌症试验相关的经济评估中的生活质量问题与问卷构成、随访时间、访谈安排、患者依从性和医生接受度等实际问题有关。本文将讨论这些问题,并给出一些癌症试验中生活质量测量设计的实用指南。