Herrmann W M, Kubicki S T, Boden S, Eich F X, Attali P, Coquelin J P
Department of Clinical Psychiatry, Free University of Berlin, Germany.
J Int Med Res. 1993 Nov-Dec;21(6):306-22. doi: 10.1177/030006059302100602.
In a pilot double-blind trial in 21 patients with learned or idiopathic insomnia (DSM-IIIR), patients received placebo for 1 week (nights 1-7), either active (zolpidem, 10 mg) or placebo treatment for 2 weeks (nights 8-21) and then placebo for a further week (nights 22-28). Variables to measure efficacy, rebound and withdrawal were assessed daily from day 1 to day 28. Polysomnographic recordings together with sleep cycle analysis were performed on nights 7, 21 and 28. Patients treated with 10 mg zolpidem for 2 weeks had significantly improved sleep efficiency at the end of the randomised double-blind phase compared with the placebo group. Fractionated sleep-cycle analysis showed an increase in slow-wave sleep during the first 2-hour cycle after sleep onset. During the withdrawal placebo week, most of the main sleep variables remained relatively stable in the zolpidem group (nights 22-28), and deteriorated further in the placebo group. At the end of the withdrawal phase, there was a statistically significant difference between groups, in favour of the zolpidem treatment, in sleep efficiency, total sleep time, absolute and percentage of time awake, and percentage of REM sleep. REM sleep, which was normal in both groups at baseline, decreased significantly in the placebo group between nights 22 and 28 (during the withdrawal placebo week) compared with the zolpidem treatment group, and the number of periods of time awake increased. Minor subjective complaints were recorded under zolpidem and were comparable with those under placebo. Zolpidem seemed to improve some important sleep variables, when assessed both objectively and subjectively. The sleep cycle analysis suggested a possible shift of slow-wave sleep to an earlier period of the night, with a more physiological sleep structure. There was no evidence for withdrawal or rebound after stopping the 2 weeks of zolpidem treatment, but rather signs that the effect of zolpidem outlasted active treatment. The present pilot study justifies a prospective confirmatory comparison of zolpidem with benzodiazepines in an adequate number of patients and withdrawal after 6-8 weeks of treatment.
在一项针对21名患有习得性或特发性失眠症(DSM-IIIR)患者的双盲试验中,患者先接受1周(第1 - 7晚)的安慰剂治疗,然后接受2周(第8 - 21晚)的活性药物(唑吡坦,10毫克)或安慰剂治疗,之后再接受1周(第22 - 28晚)的安慰剂治疗。从第1天到第28天,每天评估测量疗效、反跳和戒断反应的变量。在第7、21和28晚进行多导睡眠图记录及睡眠周期分析。与安慰剂组相比,接受10毫克唑吡坦治疗2周的患者在随机双盲阶段结束时睡眠效率显著提高。分段睡眠周期分析显示,睡眠开始后的前2小时周期内慢波睡眠增加。在停用安慰剂的那一周,唑吡坦组(第22 - 28晚)的大多数主要睡眠变量保持相对稳定,而安慰剂组的这些变量则进一步恶化。在戒断阶段结束时,两组在睡眠效率、总睡眠时间、清醒时间的绝对值和百分比以及快速眼动睡眠百分比方面存在统计学上的显著差异,有利于唑吡坦治疗。两组在基线时快速眼动睡眠均正常,但与唑吡坦治疗组相比,安慰剂组在第22至28晚(停用安慰剂的那一周)快速眼动睡眠显著减少,清醒时间段数量增加。使用唑吡坦时记录到轻微的主观不适,与使用安慰剂时相当。从客观和主观评估来看,唑吡坦似乎改善了一些重要的睡眠变量。睡眠周期分析表明,慢波睡眠可能向夜间较早时段转移,睡眠结构更接近生理状态。没有证据表明在停止2周唑吡坦治疗后出现戒断或反跳反应,反而有迹象表明唑吡坦的作用在活性治疗期后仍持续存在。目前的这项初步研究证明有必要在足够数量的患者中对唑吡坦与苯二氮䓬类药物进行前瞻性对照比较,并在治疗6 - 8周后停药。