Lieberman Joseph A
Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Hockessin, DE, USA.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(1):25-31. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v09n0105.
From a safety perspective, several issues require assessment when a decision is made to prescribe a sleep medication, including next-day residual effects, the potential for abuse, tolerance, and dependence. This article aims to provide an update of the safety profile of agents commonly used in the management of insomnia, with an emphasis on newly approved hypnotics.
Publications relevant to the subject of this review were identified by a PubMed search (conducted without date restrictions; search terms: insomnia WITH safety OR tolerability OR side effects OR tolerance OR dependence OR abuse OR residual effects AND benzodiazepines OR non-benzodiazepines OR zolpidem OR eszopiclone OR zaleplon OR ramelteon OR melatonin OR trazodone OR antihistamines OR alcohol OR alternative therapies), and additional articles (selected by the author on the basis of his experience) were included.
Publications relevant to the objective of this article were obtained, and the key safety data relating to adverse events, next-day residual effects, tolerance, and withdrawal were summarized.
The non-benzodiazepines (eszopiclone, zolpidem, zolpidem extended-release, and zaleplon), which have largely replaced the benzodiazepines for insomnia treatment, have a lower risk of tolerance, dependence, abuse, and residual effects compared with benzodiazepines. The modified-release formulation of zolpidem demonstrates a comparable safety profile to that of original zolpidem but has an additional sleep maintenance benefit. Ramelteon, a novel melatonin receptor agonist, is indicated for sleep-onset difficulties and is not scheduled. Over-the-counter agents, alternative therapies, and the prescription of off-label drugs, such as trazodone, have a lack of controlled clinical efficacy and safety studies in the treatment of insomnia and as a result should be used with caution.
Overall, published studies report that the safety of insomnia treatments has improved considerably over the past 10 years with the introduction of agents that provide improved safety, particularly with regard to next-day residual effects and abuse liability.
从安全性角度来看,在决定开具睡眠药物时,有几个问题需要评估,包括次日残留效应、滥用可能性、耐受性和依赖性。本文旨在更新失眠管理中常用药物的安全性概况,重点关注新批准的催眠药。
通过PubMed搜索(无日期限制;搜索词:失眠与安全性或耐受性或副作用或耐受性或依赖性或滥用或残留效应以及苯二氮䓬类或非苯二氮䓬类或唑吡坦或艾司佐匹克隆或扎来普隆或雷美替胺或褪黑素或曲唑酮或抗组胺药或酒精或替代疗法)确定了与本综述主题相关的出版物,并纳入了其他文章(由作者根据其经验挑选)。
获取了与本文目的相关的出版物,并总结了与不良事件、次日残留效应、耐受性和戒断相关的关键安全数据。
非苯二氮䓬类药物(艾司佐匹克隆、唑吡坦、缓释唑吡坦和扎来普隆)在很大程度上已取代苯二氮䓬类药物用于失眠治疗,与苯二氮䓬类药物相比,其耐受性、依赖性、滥用和残留效应的风险更低。唑吡坦的缓释制剂显示出与原唑吡坦相当的安全性概况,但具有额外的睡眠维持益处。雷美替胺是一种新型褪黑素受体激动剂,适用于入睡困难,且未被列入管制药品。非处方药物、替代疗法以及如曲唑酮等标签外药物的处方在失眠治疗中缺乏对照临床疗效和安全性研究,因此应谨慎使用。
总体而言,已发表的研究报告称,在过去10年中,随着安全性更高的药物的引入,失眠治疗的安全性有了显著改善,特别是在次日残留效应和滥用倾向方面。