Diem C J
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1993 Dec;7(4):196-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993507.
Shoes for jogging are presently being tested by a great many institutes using widely divergent criteria and according to a plethora of different interests, and hence the assessments and test results may be poles apart and even contradictory. Most of the tests are based on much too short stress periods and either disregard biomechanical properties entirely or determine them via methods that must be classified as questionable. Today no manufacturer offers models one could definitely classify as excellent or deficient. A shoe for jogging may be optimal for one jogger and fatal for another. The following article sets criteria yielding two important kinds of information: on the one hand, an analysis of weak points that will help the manufacturer by telling him where he must improve his product, and on the other hand target-group oriented usage recommendations for the benefit of the consumer (jogger) that help him to find the shoe that suits him best among a never-ending conglomerate of sports shoes.
目前，许多机构正在使用大相径庭的标准并依据大量不同的关注点对慢跑鞋进行测试，因此评估和测试结果可能相差甚远甚至相互矛盾。大多数测试所基于的压力测试期太短，要么完全忽视生物力学特性，要么通过必须被归类为有问题的方法来确定这些特性。如今，没有一家制造商提供的型号能被明确归类为优秀或有缺陷。一双慢跑鞋对一个慢跑者可能是最佳选择，而对另一个慢跑者可能是致命的。以下文章设定了标准，可产生两类重要信息：一方面，对弱点进行分析，这将有助于制造商了解他必须在哪些方面改进产品；另一方面，为消费者（慢跑者）提供以目标群体为导向的使用建议，帮助他在层出不穷的运动鞋中找到最适合自己的鞋子。
