de Leizaola M A
Fédération Francophone pour le Planning Familial Naturel, Couple-Amour-Fécondité, asbl, Belgique.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1998 Mar;27(2):174-80.
A Belgian pilot-study conducted in the framework of the prospective European multi-center study (University of Düsseldorf) tried to establish the use-effectiveness (a sine qua non condition for its acceptance in Europe) of natural family planning.
84 participants provided data (sympto-thermal chart and related information) on 1,750 cycles where family planning intention was to avoid a pregnancy. The average age of the women was 32 years. A contraceptive method (mainly oral contraceptives) was employed previously by 61% of them. The sympto-thermal method used by the test group highlights the beginning and the end of the menstrual cycle's fertile period by a double check. As to the start of the fertile period, the criteria are: a calculation on the length of the previous twelve cycles and the first sign of mucus at either the vulva or the cervix. Indicators of the end of this phase are: the third day of high temperature and the fourth evening after either the peak mucus day or the peak cervix day. 75% of the women involved generally use the cervical auto-palpation.
No method failure at all has been detected. Two unplanned pregnancies occurred due to user failure. The total Pearl index for the study was 1.4. When examining only those cycles (85% of the reported cycles) where no protected sexual intercourse occurred during the fertile phase, practical efficacy of the method analysed was 1.8 according to Pearl index. Furthermore, taking into account protected and unprotected sexual intercourse occurred during the fertile phase, we observed that sexual abstinence was practised during the "risk" period of 75% of the cycles.
The results of this test study demonstrate the practical efficiency of a modern natural family planning method. The high level of cycles during which periodic abstinence was employed testify to the acceptability of the method used.
在欧洲前瞻性多中心研究(杜塞尔多夫大学)框架内进行的一项比利时试点研究,试图确定自然计划生育的使用效果(这是其在欧洲被接受的必要条件)。
84名参与者提供了1750个周期的数据(症状体温图表及相关信息),这些周期的计划生育意图是避免怀孕。女性的平均年龄为32岁。其中61%的人之前使用过避孕方法(主要是口服避孕药)。测试组使用的症状体温法通过双重检查突出月经周期排卵期的开始和结束。关于排卵期的开始,标准如下:根据前十二个周期的长度进行计算,以及外阴或宫颈出现黏液的第一个迹象。该阶段结束的指标为:高温的第三天,以及黏液高峰日或宫颈高峰日后的第四个晚上。参与研究的女性中75%通常进行宫颈自我触诊。
未检测到任何方法失败情况。因使用者失误发生了两例意外怀孕。该研究的总 Pearl 指数为1.4。仅检查那些在排卵期未发生无保护性交的周期(占报告周期的85%)时,根据 Pearl 指数分析该方法的实际有效率为1.8。此外,考虑到在排卵期发生的有保护和无保护性交情况,我们观察到在75%的周期的“危险期”实行了性禁欲。
该测试研究结果证明了一种现代自然计划生育方法的实际有效性。采用定期禁欲的周期比例较高,证明了所使用方法的可接受性。