Dingley J, Whitehead M J, Wareham K
Department of Anaesthesia, Singleton Hospital, Swansea.
Anaesthesia. 1994 Mar;49(3):251-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03434.x.
In a prospective study of 150 patients randomly assigned to three groups, we have compared the incidence and duration of sore throat after a standard anaesthetic regimen using three different methods of airway management: facemask; laryngeal mask, and laryngeal mask with insertion aid. The insertion aid is currently being developed by Portex Ltd and is intended both to facilitate accurate placement of the laryngeal mask and to reduce trauma during insertion. All the patients were women undergoing short operative procedures requiring minimal postoperative analgesia. The incidence of sore throat was significantly less with a facemask (8%) than with the laryngeal mask when used without the insertion aid (28.5%) (p < 0.02). When using the insertion aid the incidence was 18% and this was not statistically different from the facemask. The presence of blood on the laryngeal mask (22%) was less likely when the insertion aid was used (4%) (p < 0.02).
在一项对150例患者进行的前瞻性研究中,这些患者被随机分为三组,我们比较了采用三种不同气道管理方法(面罩、喉罩以及带插入辅助装置的喉罩)的标准麻醉方案后咽痛的发生率和持续时间。插入辅助装置目前由波特克斯有限公司研发,旨在便于喉罩准确放置并减少插入过程中的创伤。所有患者均为接受短小手术且术后镇痛需求 minimal 的女性。使用面罩时咽痛发生率(8%)显著低于未使用插入辅助装置的喉罩(28.5%)(p < 0.02)。使用插入辅助装置时发生率为18%,与面罩无统计学差异。使用插入辅助装置时喉罩上出现血迹的情况(4%)比未使用时(22%)更少(p < 0.02)。