Conway A S, Melzer D, Hale A S
United Medical School, Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital, London.
BMJ. 1994 Mar 5;308(6929):627-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6929.627a.
To report outcome of targeting community mental health services to people with schizophrenia in an inner London district who had been shown, one year after discharge, to have high levels of psychotic symptomatology and social disability but very low levels of supported housing and structured day activity.
Repeat interview survey of symptoms, disability, and receipt of care four years after index discharge.
Inner London health district with considerable social deprivation and a mental hospital in the process of closure.
51 patients originally aged 20-65 years who satisfied the research diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia.
Contact with services during the three months before interview, levels of symptoms (from present state examination), global social disability rating.
65% (33/51) of the study group had been readmitted at least once in the three years between surveys. Recent contacts with community psychiatric nurses and rates of hospital admission increased (8 at one year v 24 at four years, p < 0.01; 5 v 13, p < 0.06). Conversely, fewer patients were in contact with social workers (17 v 7, p < 0.03). Proportions in supported housing, day care, or sheltered work did not change. Unemployment rates remained very high. A considerable reduction (almost a halving) in psychiatric symptoms was observed, but there was no significant change in mean levels of social disability.
The policy of targeting the long term mentally ill resulted in significant increases in professional psychiatric input to the cohort but failed to improve access to social workers or suitable accommodation. Improvements in social functioning did not follow from reductions in the proportions of patients with psychotic mental states. Social interventions are likely to be crucial to achieving the Health of the Nation target of improving social functioning for the seriously mentally ill, as improving mental state seems in itself to be insufficient.
报告针对伦敦市中心区精神分裂症患者提供社区心理健康服务的结果。这些患者在出院一年后被发现存在高水平的精神病症状和社会残疾,但获得支持性住房和结构化日间活动的水平极低。
在首次出院四年后对症状、残疾情况及护理接受情况进行重复访谈调查。
伦敦市中心卫生区,社会贫困程度较高,且有一家正在关闭的精神病院。
51名最初年龄在20 - 65岁之间、符合精神分裂症研究诊断标准的患者。
访谈前三个月内与服务机构的接触情况、症状水平(根据现况检查)、总体社会残疾评定。
研究组中65%(33/51)的患者在两次调查之间的三年里至少再次入院一次。与社区精神科护士的近期接触及住院率有所增加(一年时为8例,四年时为24例,p < 0.01;5例对13例,p < 0.06)。相反,与社会工作者接触的患者减少(17例对7例,p < 0.03)。接受支持性住房、日间护理或庇护性工作的比例没有变化。失业率仍然很高。观察到精神病症状有显著减少(几乎减半),但社会残疾的平均水平没有显著变化。
针对长期精神病患者的政策导致对该队列的专业精神病学投入显著增加,但未能改善与社会工作者的接触或获得合适住所的机会。精神病态患者比例的降低并未带来社会功能的改善。社会干预对于实现国家健康目标中改善重症精神病患者的社会功能可能至关重要,因为仅改善精神状态本身似乎并不够。