Melzer D, Hale A S, Malik S J, Hogman G A, Wood S
West Lambeth Health Authority, St Thomas's Hospital, London.
BMJ. 1991 Oct 26;303(6809):1023-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1023.
To document the circumstances and care of patients with schizophrenia who had recently been discharged from local psychiatric inpatient services, and to establish the extent to which misgivings about community care might be justified.
Cross sectional surveys with review of case notes. Follow up interviews with questionnaires administered one year after discharge.
Two inner London districts (West Lambeth and Lewisham) with high levels of social deprivation and at different stages of developing community services.
90 and 50 patients in the two services respectively, aged 18 to 65, who satisfied the Research Diagnostic Criteria for schizophrenia and who were discharged from inpatient services.
Diagnosis elicited by present state examination, global social disability rating, use of services during the three months before interview.
89 of the 140 patients (64%) had been ill for five or more years, yet few were former long stay inpatients. 55% (50/91; 95% confidence interval 45% to 65%) of those interviewed had current psychotic mental states and 22% (27/124; 16% to 31%) were functioning socially at very poor or severely maladjusted levels. 86% (107/124) were unemployed. The majority of patients had seen a mental health or social service professional, yet only 16% (20/124) were in specialised accomodation (excluding hospitals) and only 23% (17/73) of those eligible had used day care. Small numbers of people had experienced homelessness (two) or imprisonment (four over six months).
Many schizophrenic patients leaving local psychiatric inpatient care have active symptomatology and profound social disabilities. Community care was characterised by high rates of contact with service professionals but little supported accommodation or day activity. This group of clients may require dedicated provision, which would actively encourage them to use services protected from the demands of those with less severe illness.
记录近期从当地精神科住院服务机构出院的精神分裂症患者的情况及护理情况,并确定对社区护理的担忧在何种程度上可能是合理的。
采用横断面调查并查阅病例记录。出院一年后进行随访访谈并发放问卷。
伦敦市中心的两个区(西兰贝斯和刘易舍姆),社会贫困程度高,且处于社区服务发展的不同阶段。
两个服务机构分别有90名和50名患者,年龄在18至65岁之间,符合精神分裂症的研究诊断标准且已从住院服务机构出院。
通过现况检查得出的诊断、总体社会残疾评定、访谈前三个月内的服务使用情况。
140名患者中有89名(64%)患病已达五年或更长时间,但很少有人曾长期住院。55%(50/91;95%置信区间45%至65%)的受访者目前处于精神病性精神状态,22%(27/124;16%至31%)的社会功能处于非常差或严重失调的水平。86%(107/124)失业。大多数患者曾见过心理健康或社会服务专业人员,但只有16%(20/124)住在专门的住所(不包括医院),符合条件的患者中只有23%(17/73)使用过日间护理。少数人经历过无家可归(两人)或入狱(六人中有四人超过六个月)。
许多从当地精神科住院护理机构出院的精神分裂症患者有活跃的症状和严重的社会残疾。社区护理的特点是与服务专业人员的接触率高,但支持性住所或日间活动很少。这群患者可能需要专门的服务,这将积极鼓励他们使用免受病情较轻者需求影响的服务。