Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(1):11-24. doi: 10.2190/4PL1-HRRK-LAF0-31EY.
Advocates for health care reform (representing a broad range of constituencies) raise serious concerns about the ability of managed competition to meet the health care needs of the American people. Similarities in managed competition proposals include establishment of a collective purchasing authority, creation of health plans, standardization of rules and requirements, and limitation on tax subsidies. Managed competition proposals vary as to whether they call for true universality, meaningful cost containment, and fair financing. The article raises questions about managed competition, including the technical feasibility; the link to employment; the role for insurance companies; severing the link between insurance and income, age, or health status; comprehensive benefits; cost containment; the role for managed care; universality of coverage; and the role for insurance companies to make treatment decisions.
医疗保健改革的倡导者(代表广泛的选民群体)对管理式竞争满足美国人民医疗保健需求的能力提出了严重关切。管理式竞争提案的相似之处包括设立集体采购机构、创建健康计划、规则和要求的标准化以及税收补贴限制。管理式竞争提案在是否要求真正的普遍性、有意义的成本控制和公平融资方面存在差异。本文提出了有关管理式竞争的问题,包括技术可行性;与就业的联系;保险公司的作用;切断保险与收入、年龄或健康状况之间的联系;全面福利;成本控制;管理式医疗的作用;覆盖范围的普遍性;以及保险公司在做出治疗决策方面的作用。