Kahn K L, Pearson M L, Harrison E R, Desmond K A, Rogers W H, Rubenstein L V, Brook R H, Keeler E B
Health Program of RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
JAMA. 1994 Apr 20;271(15):1169-74.
To analyze whether elderly patients who are black or from poor neighborhoods receive worse hospital care than other patients, taking account of hospital effects and using validated measures of quality of care.
We compare quality of care provided to insured, hospitalized Medicare patients who are black or live in poor neighborhoods as compared with others, using simple and multivariable comparisons of clinically detailed measures of sickness at admission, quality, and outcomes.
Two hundred ninety-seven acute care hospitals in 30 areas within five states.
The sample includes a nationally representative sample of 9932 patients 65 years of age or older who lived at home prior to hospitalization for congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, or stroke.
This was an observational study.
Processes of care, length of stay, instability at discharge, discharge destination, and mortality.
Within rural, urban nonteaching, and urban teaching hospitals, patients who are black or from poor neighborhoods have worse processes of care and greater instability at discharge than other patients (P < .05). However, this worse quality is offset by patients who are black or from poor neighborhoods being 1.8 times more likely to receive care in urban teaching hospitals that have been shown to provide better quality of care (P < .001). Because these patients receive more of their care in better-quality hospitals, there are no overall differences in quality by race and poverty status. Death rates did not vary by race or poverty status.
Quality of hospital care for insured Medicare patients in influenced both by the patient's race and financial characteristics and by the hospital type in which the patient receives care.
考虑医院因素并使用经过验证的医疗质量衡量指标,分析黑人老年患者或来自贫困社区的老年患者是否比其他患者接受的医院护理更差。
我们将为参保的住院医疗保险患者提供的护理质量进行比较,这些患者为黑人或居住在贫困社区,与其他患者相比,我们使用入院时疾病的临床详细测量指标、质量和结果进行简单和多变量比较。
五个州内30个地区的297家急性护理医院。
样本包括9932名65岁及以上患者的全国代表性样本,这些患者在因充血性心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死、肺炎或中风住院前居住在家中。
这是一项观察性研究。
护理过程、住院时间、出院时的不稳定情况、出院目的地和死亡率。
在农村、城市非教学医院和城市教学医院中,黑人患者或来自贫困社区的患者比其他患者的护理过程更差,出院时的不稳定情况更严重(P < .05)。然而,这种较差的质量被黑人患者或来自贫困社区的患者抵消了,他们在已被证明提供更好护理质量的城市教学医院接受护理的可能性是其他患者的1.8倍(P < .001)。由于这些患者在质量更好的医院接受更多护理,按种族和贫困状况划分的护理质量没有总体差异。死亡率不因种族或贫困状况而有所不同。
参保医疗保险患者的医院护理质量受患者的种族和经济特征以及患者接受护理的医院类型的影响。