Truscott S D, Narrett C M, Smith S E
Graduate School, School Psychology Program, Alfred University, NY 14802-1232.
Psychol Rep. 1994 Feb;74(1):147-56. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.147.
This study investigated the test-retest reliabilities of the WISC-R IQs and scaled scores on subtests over 3- and 6-yr. intervals for a learning disabled sample. Statistical procedures and individual analyses were conducted on a sample of 107 students who had at least two evaluations. For the total sample, 3-yr. test-retest reliabilities of the Verbal IQ, Performance IQ, and Full Scale IQ were .69, .72, and .77, respectively. Subtest reliabilities ranged from .33 to .71, with a median of .49, but nine subtests had reliabilities of .62 or lower. Individual analyses indicated considerable variability, with some students decreasing as much as 33 IQ points on retest. Similar results were noted for a subsample of 41 students who had three evaluations over a 6-yr. period. Problems with subtest interpretation due to the inconsistency of the WISC-R scores and extensions of this research to the WISC-III are discussed.
本研究调查了学习障碍样本在3年和6年间隔期内WISC-R智商及各分测验量表分的重测信度。对107名至少接受过两次评估的学生样本进行了统计程序和个体分析。对于整个样本,言语智商、操作智商和总智商的3年重测信度分别为0.69、0.72和0.77。分测验信度范围为0.33至0.71,中位数为0.49,但有9个分测验的信度为0.62或更低。个体分析表明存在相当大的变异性,一些学生在重测时智商下降多达33分。对于在6年期间接受过三次评估的41名学生的子样本,也得出了类似结果。文中讨论了由于WISC-R分数不一致导致的分测验解释问题,以及本研究对WISC-III的扩展。