Bolen L M, Aichinger K S, Hall C W, Webster R E
Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4354, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):89-94. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<89::aid-jclp2270510114>3.0.co;2-l.
This study compared differences in performance on the WISC-III and on the WISC-R. Sixty-one students with learning impairments, due for reevaluation of their special education placement, were administered the WISC-III as part of a psychological assessment battery. Results indicate a mean difference between WISC-R and WISC-III FSIQ of 7.95 points, which is similar to WISC/WISC-R comparisons. Substantial differences that averaged 9.21 points were found between WISC-R and WISC-III PIQ means. These findings suggest that for a special education sample an average decrease of at least 8 points can be expected on the WISC-III Full Scale IQ. Caution should be exercised when one is considering changes in educational classification or interpreting qualitative differences in performance on WISC-III scores compared with WISC-R scores.
本研究比较了韦氏儿童智力量表第三版(WISC - III)和韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC - R)在测试表现上的差异。61名因需重新评估特殊教育安置情况而存在学习障碍的学生,作为心理评估组合测试的一部分接受了韦氏儿童智力量表第三版测试。结果表明,韦氏儿童智力量表修订版和韦氏儿童智力量表第三版的全量表智商(FSIQ)平均差异为7.95分,这与韦氏儿童智力量表/韦氏儿童智力量表修订版的比较结果相似。韦氏儿童智力量表修订版和韦氏儿童智力量表第三版的操作智商(PIQ)均值之间存在平均为9.21分的显著差异。这些发现表明,对于特殊教育样本而言,韦氏儿童智力量表第三版的全量表智商预计平均至少下降8分。在考虑教育分类的变化或解释与韦氏儿童智力量表修订版分数相比韦氏儿童智力量表第三版分数在表现上的质性差异时应谨慎行事。