Berntson G G, Uchino B N, Cacioppo J T
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
Psychophysiology. 1994 Mar;31(2):204-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01042.x.
The Law of Initial Value (LIV) asserts that the magnitude of a phasic psychophysiological response is dependent on the initial baseline level. Although results in accord with the LIV are often observed, exceptions are frequent, especially for between-subjects analyses. A general assumption in studies of the LIV is that a given baseline difference is equivalent regardless of its functional origin. The present study examined the relationships between basal heart period variance, arising from alternate sources, and the magnitude of the chronotropic response to a speech stressor. Results reveal that baseline differences due to orthostatic manipulations, which are known to be largely of autonomic origin, yielded larger LIV effects than did individual differences in basal heart period, which include a significant nonautonomic component. The minimal LIV-like effects of baseline differences associated with non-autonomic factors, relative to variations in autonomic control, may contribute to the inconsistent appearance of between-subjects LIV effects.
初始值定律(LIV)认为,阶段性心理生理反应的强度取决于初始基线水平。尽管经常观察到符合LIV的结果,但例外情况也很常见,尤其是在进行受试者间分析时。LIV研究中的一个普遍假设是,给定的基线差异无论其功能起源如何都是等效的。本研究考察了源自不同来源的基础心率周期变异性与对言语应激源的变时反应强度之间的关系。结果显示,已知主要源于自主神经的体位性操作引起的基线差异,比包含显著非自主成分的基础心率周期个体差异产生的LIV效应更大。相对于自主神经控制的变化,与非自主因素相关的基线差异产生的类似LIV的最小效应,可能导致受试者间LIV效应的不一致表现。