Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kröger H
Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Kuopio, Finland.
Scand J Dent Res. 1994 Feb;102(1):68-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01156.x.
The diagnostic efficacies of three panoramic-based indices were compared with classification of bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The panoramic indices were 1) cortical bone height, 2) an ordinal classification, and 3) the Panoramic Mandibular Index. The results indicate that panoramic dental radiographs should not be used to assess the patient's status regarding osteoporosis, although the means of the variables in different mineral density groups of skeleton may differ significantly.
将基于全景片的三个指标的诊断效能与通过双能X线吸收法进行的骨密度分类进行了比较。全景片指标为:1)皮质骨高度,2)序数分类,3)全景下颌指数。结果表明,尽管骨骼不同矿物质密度组中各变量的均值可能存在显著差异,但全景牙科X光片不应被用于评估患者的骨质疏松状况。