Tavel M E, Brown D D, Shander D
Indiana Heart Institute, Indianapolis.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Apr 25;154(8):893-8.
To provide an objective method to support and teach auscultation, a new portable system (graphic display system) was evaluated for graphic display and printing of heart sounds.
Ninety-one patients from three institutions, with a variety of heart sound abnormalities, were studied by two examiners. A graphic recording was made in each and compared with the auscultatory findings.
The findings of the graphic system confirmed the auscultatory impressions of both examiners in 77 (85%) of the 91 cases. Brief sound transients, such as split second sounds and ejection sounds, third heart sounds, and prosthetic opening and closing sounds, were all regularly recorded with the graphic system, often allowing resolution when examiners were in disagreement. Graphic recordings commonly were at variance with examiners in detecting fourth sounds, possibly because of examiners' difficulty in distinguishing these from split first sounds as well as limitations of the graphic system itself. High-pitched murmurs of low intensity (< grade 2), as exemplified by those of aortic and mitral regurgitation, were occasionally missed by the graphic system, probably because of baseline interference by background noise.
The graphic display system can often provide more information than can be obtained by standard auscultation alone, especially in the detection of low-frequency and multiple sounds, and in the accurate timing of intervals. It is often unable to detect soft high-frequency murmurs. Permanent records allow for more objective comparison of the auscultatory findings of various examiners at different times. This system provides an excellent means by which auscultation skills may be taught or enhanced, especially since its speed and portability allow immediate feedback for comparison with auditory perceptions.
为提供一种支持和教授听诊的客观方法,对一种新的便携式系统(图形显示系统)进行了评估,以用于心音的图形显示和打印。
来自三个机构的91名患有各种心音异常的患者由两名检查者进行研究。对每名患者进行图形记录,并与听诊结果进行比较。
在91例病例中的77例(85%),图形系统的结果证实了两名检查者的听诊印象。图形系统能够常规记录短暂的心音,如第二心音分裂、喷射音、第三心音以及人工瓣膜开闭音,当检查者意见不一致时,图形记录常常有助于明确诊断。在检测第四心音时,图形记录通常与检查者的判断不一致,这可能是因为检查者难以将其与第一心音分裂区分开来,以及图形系统本身存在局限性。图形系统偶尔会遗漏低强度(<2级)的高音调杂音,如主动脉瓣和二尖瓣反流的杂音,这可能是由于背景噪声的基线干扰所致。
图形显示系统通常能够提供比单纯标准听诊更多的信息,特别是在检测低频和多个心音以及准确确定间期方面。它常常无法检测到柔和的高频杂音。永久性记录能够更客观地比较不同检查者在不同时间的听诊结果。该系统提供了一种极好的方法来教授或提高听诊技能,特别是因为其速度和便携性允许立即反馈以便与听觉感知进行比较。