Sandhu K S, Joshi D V
Department of Veterinary Bacteriology and Virology College of Veterinary Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1993 Oct;36(4):458-65.
Serum samples from 1134 vaccinated and non vaccinated animals (775 cattle and 359 buffaloes) were screened with different serological tests like Rose Bengal plate Test (RBPT), plate agglutination test (PAT) and standard tube agglutination test (SAT). The agreement between these three screening tests was 87.19% and 97.86% in vaccinated and non vaccinated cattle while corresponding figures in buffaloes were 91.56% and 84.42%. Among vaccinated animals a positive percentage of 12.8 and 8.8 was noticed in cattle was 4.7 and 6.3, respectively by RBPT. All the positive sera samples were further tested by mercaptoethanol test (MET) and heat inactivation test (HIT) to conform the result of screening tests and to differentiate vaccinal titre from that of active infection. It was concluded that RBPT is overall best screening test to diagnose bovine brucellosis. MET and HIT are good supplementary tests but MET is better than HIT both in cattle and buffaloes. Some high titered non vaccinated buffaloes were negative in RBPT but positive by all other tests.
对1134只接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的动物(775头牛和359头水牛)的血清样本进行了不同血清学检测,如玫瑰红平板试验(RBPT)、平板凝集试验(PAT)和标准试管凝集试验(SAT)。这三种筛查试验在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的牛中的一致性分别为87.19%和97.86%,而在水牛中的相应数字分别为91.56%和84.42%。在接种疫苗的动物中,RBPT检测到牛的阳性率分别为12.8%和8.8%,水牛的阳性率分别为4.7%和6.3%。所有阳性血清样本均进一步通过巯基乙醇试验(MET)和热灭活试验(HIT)进行检测,以确认筛查试验结果,并区分疫苗效价和活跃感染效价。得出结论,RBPT是诊断牛布鲁氏菌病的总体最佳筛查试验。MET和HIT是很好的补充试验,但在牛和水牛中MET都比HIT更好。一些高滴度的未接种疫苗的水牛在RBPT中呈阴性,但在所有其他试验中呈阳性。