Suppr超能文献

评价血清学诊断试验在地方性流行地区奶牛牛群中牛布鲁氏菌病的应用:一项多中心研究。

Evaluation of serological diagnostic tests for bovine brucellosis in dairy cattle herds in an endemic area: a multicenter study.

机构信息

Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute (RVSRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

Iranian Veterinary Organization, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Mar 1;55(2):104. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03519-1.

Abstract

Brucellosis is known as one of the most common zoonotic diseases worldwide affecting both livestock and humans. It causes abortions, reduces milk production, and infertility in infected animals. The disease is routinely diagnosed through three serological techniques, such as rose bengal plate test (RBPT), standard agglutination test (SAT), and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA). The aim of this study was to identify and compare the brucellosis seroprevalence among dairy cattle farms through these different serological tests. From 2112 sampled dairy cattle in different parts of Iran, RBPT, SAT, and I-ELISA led to 296 (14.02%), 215 (10.18%), and 297 (14.06%) positive results, respectively. Brucella abortus biovar 3 (62 cases) was identified as the most common cause of brucellosis in tested animals. Our results showed that the specificity and sensitivity of I-ELISA were higher than those obtained by RBPT and SAT. In this study, the overall agreement of RBPT and SAT with I-ELISA reached 95.21% and 94.12% in dairy cattle farms, respectively. Furthermore, Cohen's kappa statistical analysis revealed that the best degree of agreement was seen between RBPT and I-ELISA (0.80), followed by RBPT and SAT (0.78) and finally SAT and I-ELISA (0.72), thereby indicating a strong agreement between RBPT and I-ELISA methods and good agreement between SAT and I-ELISA methods. The McNemar analysis also showed that a significant difference exists between positive and negative results determined by SAT and I-ELISA methods (p < 0.0001). However, the positive and negative results determined by I-ELISA and RBPT did not show a significant difference (p = 0.9207). Therefore, I-ELISA was a more specific and sensitive serological test when compared to RBPT and SAT and could remarkably decrease non-specific reaction by improving the serological screening specificity for an accurate brucellosis diagnosis in endemic areas.

摘要

布鲁氏菌病是世界范围内最常见的动物源性传染病之一,影响家畜和人类。它会导致受感染动物流产、产奶量减少和不孕。该疾病通常通过三种血清学技术进行诊断,如虎红平板试验(RBPT)、标准凝集试验(SAT)和间接酶联免疫吸附试验(I-ELISA)。本研究旨在通过这些不同的血清学检测方法,确定并比较伊朗不同地区奶牛场的布鲁氏菌病血清流行率。从伊朗不同地区的 2112 头采样奶牛中,RBPT、SAT 和 I-ELISA 的阳性结果分别为 296 例(14.02%)、215 例(10.18%)和 297 例(14.06%)。检测动物中最常见的布鲁氏菌病病因是流产布鲁氏菌生物 3 型(62 例)。我们的结果表明,I-ELISA 的特异性和敏感性高于 RBPT 和 SAT。在这项研究中,RBPT 和 SAT 与 I-ELISA 的总体一致性在奶牛场分别达到 95.21%和 94.12%。此外,Cohen's kappa 统计分析表明,RBPT 和 I-ELISA 之间的一致性最好(0.80),其次是 RBPT 和 SAT(0.78),最后是 SAT 和 I-ELISA(0.72),这表明 RBPT 和 I-ELISA 方法之间存在很强的一致性,SAT 和 I-ELISA 方法之间也存在很好的一致性。McNemar 分析还表明,SAT 和 I-ELISA 方法确定的阳性和阴性结果之间存在显著差异(p<0.0001)。然而,I-ELISA 和 RBPT 确定的阳性和阴性结果之间没有显示出显著差异(p=0.9207)。因此,与 RBPT 和 SAT 相比,I-ELISA 是一种更特异和敏感的血清学检测方法,可以通过提高血清学筛查特异性,显著减少非特异性反应,从而在流行地区实现对布鲁氏菌病的准确诊断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验