Gol'tsman M E, Popov S V, Chabovskiĭ A V, Borisova N G
Zh Obshch Biol. 1994 Jan-Feb;55(1):49-69.
To explain the evolution of sociality the authors propose the hypothesis that every social interaction is based on the contest. The synergetic nature of any interaction determines the permanent involving partners in the contests and leads to increasing social pressure within community. The contestants' interactions inhibit an activity in one of the partners. Two possible evolutionary strategies of adaptation to increasing social density are: 1) an increase in resistance to the activity inhibition; 2) a retaining in memory the results of inhibition, i.e. reducing of ability to restore inhibited activity. Three species of gerbils (Gerbillidae): Mongolian (Meriones unguiculatus), Libyan (M. libycus), and midday gerbil (M. meridianus) were compared. Being similar in their ecology and behavioural repertoire three species differ strongly in extent of sociality: the highest in Mongolian gerbil and the lowest in midday one. The duration of social acts in laboratory groups of gerbils as well as frequency of acts delaying conflicts under natural conditions were assumed to correlate with increase in resistance to social pressure. Both parameters were higher in mongolian and libyan gerbils. The data on dynamics, asymmetry, and stability of social relations indicates more stable retaining in memory the results of interactions in Mongolian and Libyan gerbils than in midday ones but the latter restore inhibited activity more quickly. In the laboratory groups where the available space is compressed the midday gerbils maintain population at a level not lower than Mongolian ones and much higher than M. libycus. Moreover aggression within the group of midday gerbils doesn't result in rapid population decrease as in other two species.
为了解释社会性的演变,作者提出了一个假说,即每一次社会互动都基于竞争。任何互动的协同性质决定了伙伴们持续参与竞争,并导致社区内社会压力的增加。竞争者之间的互动会抑制其中一方的活动。适应社会密度增加的两种可能的进化策略是:1)增强对活动抑制的抵抗力;2)将抑制结果保留在记忆中,即降低恢复被抑制活动的能力。对三种沙鼠(沙鼠科)进行了比较:长爪沙鼠(Meriones unguiculatus)、利比亚沙鼠(M. libycus)和子午沙鼠(M. meridianus)。这三个物种在生态和行为模式上相似,但在社会性程度上差异很大:长爪沙鼠的社会性最高,子午沙鼠的社会性最低。沙鼠实验室群体中社会行为的持续时间以及自然条件下延迟冲突行为的频率被认为与对社会压力抵抗力的增加相关。这两个参数在长爪沙鼠和利比亚沙鼠中都更高。关于社会关系动态、不对称性和稳定性的数据表明,长爪沙鼠和利比亚沙鼠比子午沙鼠更能稳定地将互动结果保留在记忆中,但子午沙鼠恢复被抑制活动的速度更快。在可用空间受到压缩的实验室群体中,子午沙鼠维持的种群数量不低于长爪沙鼠,且远高于利比亚沙鼠。此外,子午沙鼠群体内的攻击行为不会像其他两个物种那样导致种群数量迅速下降。