Tchabovsky Andrey V, Savinetskaya Ludmila E, Ovchinnikova Natalia L, Safonova Alexandra, Ilchenko Olga N, Sapozhnikova Svetlana R, Vasilieva Nina A
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Moscow, Russia.
Laboratory for Population Ecology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.
Curr Zool. 2019 Aug;65(4):363-373. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy078. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
In a study of gerbils with contrasting social and mating systems (group-living monogamous Mongolian gerbil , solitary nonterritorial promiscuous midday jird , and solitary territorial promiscuous pale gerbil ), we employed partner preference tests (PPTs) to assess among-species variation in sociability and pair-bonding patterns and tested whether the nature of contact between individuals: direct contact (DC) versus nondirect contact (NDC) affected our results. We measured male preferences as the time: 1) spent alone, 2) with familiar (partner), and 3) unfamiliar (stranger) female in the 3-chambered apparatus. Gerbil species differed strongly in sociability and male partner preferences. The time spent alone was a reliable indicator of species sociability independent of the nature of contact, whereas the pattern and level of between-species differences in male partner preferences depended on contact type: DC PPTs, unlike NDC-tests, discriminated well between monogamous and promiscuous species. In the DC-tests, stranger-directed aggression and stranger avoidance were observed both in the highly social monogamous and the solitary territorial promiscuous , but not in the nonterritorial promiscuous . In , stranger avoidance in the DC-tests increased the time spent with the partner, thus providing evidence of a partner preference that was not found in the NDC-tests, whereas in , stranger avoidance increased the time spent alone. This first comparative experimental study of partner preferences in gerbils provides new insights into the interspecific variation in gerbil sociality and mating systems and sheds light on behavioral mechanisms underlying social fidelity and pair-bonding.
在一项对具有不同社会和交配系统的沙鼠(群居一夫一妻制的蒙古沙鼠、独居非领地性滥交的子午沙鼠以及独居领地性滥交的苍白沙鼠)的研究中,我们采用伴侣偏好测试(PPTs)来评估种间在社交性和配对模式上的差异,并测试个体之间的接触性质:直接接触(DC)与非直接接触(NDC)是否会影响我们的结果。我们在三室装置中测量雄性偏好,即其1)独自度过的时间、2)与熟悉的(伴侣)雌性在一起的时间以及3)与不熟悉的(陌生)雌性在一起的时间。沙鼠物种在社交性和雄性伴侣偏好方面差异很大。独自度过的时间是物种社交性的可靠指标,与接触性质无关,而雄性伴侣偏好的种间差异模式和程度则取决于接触类型:与非直接接触测试不同,直接接触PPTs能很好地区分一夫一妻制和滥交物种。在直接接触测试中,在高度群居的一夫一妻制和独居领地性滥交的沙鼠中都观察到对陌生个体的攻击和回避,但在非领地性滥交的沙鼠中未观察到。在[具体物种1]中,直接接触测试中的陌生回避增加了与伴侣在一起的时间,从而提供了在非直接接触测试中未发现的伴侣偏好的证据,而在[具体物种2]中,陌生回避增加了独自度过的时间。这项关于沙鼠伴侣偏好的首次比较性实验研究为沙鼠社会性和交配系统的种间变异提供了新的见解,并揭示了社会忠诚和配对关系背后的行为机制。