Benditt D G, Dunbar D, Fetter J, Sakaguchi S, Lurie K G, Adler S W
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):994-1003. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90078-7.
Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation and flutter remains a difficult clinical problem. Consequently, development of an easily implantable automatic atrial cardioverter defibrillator is appealing. In this context we have examined the feasibility of intracavitary low-energy shocks delivered via transvenously positioned electrodes for termination of induced atrial tachyarrhythmias in canine models. This study extends these observations with use of single-pathway (5 msec pulse duration) and dual-pathway sequential (5/5 msec, 0.2 msec separation) shocks of varying leading edge voltages (100 to 400 V) in a closed-chest canine talc-pericarditis model. Bipolar 9.5 French electrode catheters (electrode surface areas, 0.62 cm2) were positioned at the superior vena cava-right atrium (SVC-RA) junction (labeled SVC) and right ventricular (RV) apex, with a subcutaneous plate over the chest wall. For single-pathway shocks, overall treatment effectiveness was comparable among the three vectors tested (RV apex to SVC, 35%; RV apex to subcutaneous plate, 17%; and SVC to subcutaneous plate, 35%). Furthermore, there was no evident relationship between leading edge voltage and shock effectiveness. In contrast, although each of the dual-pathway shock vector combinations tested also showed similar overall effectiveness, there was an apparent dose-response effect as leading edge voltage increased. The SVC (common) to RV apex (pulse 1) and subcutaneous plate (pulse 2) achieved 60% effectiveness at 400 V (approximately 4 joules). Thus this study provides additional evidence favoring feasibility of low-energy transvenous atrial cardioversion defibrillation. However, further refinement of energy delivery is essential for the implantable automatic atrial cardioverter defibrillator concept to become clinically accepted.
预防心房颤动和扑动的复发仍然是一个棘手的临床问题。因此,开发一种易于植入的自动心房心脏复律除颤器很有吸引力。在此背景下,我们研究了通过经静脉放置的电极进行腔内低能量电击以终止犬模型中诱发的房性快速性心律失常的可行性。本研究在封闭胸腔的犬滑石粉性心包炎模型中,使用单通路(脉冲持续时间5毫秒)和双通路顺序(5/5毫秒,间隔0.2毫秒)电击,改变前沿电压(100至400伏),扩展了这些观察结果。将双极9.5法国电极导管(电极表面积0.62平方厘米)置于上腔静脉-右心房(SVC-RA)交界处(标记为SVC)和右心室(RV)心尖,胸壁上方放置一个皮下板。对于单通路电击,在所测试的三个向量中,总体治疗效果相当(RV心尖至SVC,35%;RV心尖至皮下板,17%;SVC至皮下板,35%)。此外,前沿电压与电击效果之间没有明显关系。相比之下,尽管所测试的每种双通路电击向量组合也显示出相似的总体效果,但随着前沿电压增加,存在明显的剂量反应效应。SVC(共用)至RV心尖(脉冲1)和皮下板(脉冲2)在400伏(约4焦耳)时达到60%的有效性。因此,本研究提供了更多证据支持低能量经静脉心房心脏复律除颤的可行性。然而,对于可植入自动心房心脏复律除颤器概念要被临床接受,能量输送的进一步优化至关重要。