Polacin A, Kalender W A, Brink J, Vannier M A
Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany.
Med Phys. 1994 Jan;21(1):133-40. doi: 10.1118/1.597251.
In conventional computed tomography (CT), ramps, typically thin sheets of aluminum inclined at 45 degrees, are established tools for measurements of slice sensitivity profiles (SSP). In spiral CT, however, they yield inconsistent results for different positions along the longitudinal axis. It is explained herein how ramp profiles result as a superposition of true SSPs and artifacts, the artifacts being caused by the slice interpolation process due to the difficult interpolation condition in this particular geometry. In direct consequence, ramp tests yield spatially variant results. As an alternative tool for measuring the slice sensitivity profile, the use of a thin high-contrast sheet held between two disks which approximate the ideal test of a delta impulse in the longitudinal direction is suggested. Resulting SSPs are shown for both methods; the delta method, in agreement with theoretical predictions, provided smooth symmetrical SSPs independent of table position in agreement with theoretical predictions. It is concluded that ramps are inadequate test objects to determine SSPs in spiral CT.
在传统计算机断层扫描(CT)中,斜坡(通常是倾斜45度的薄铝板)是测量切片灵敏度分布(SSP)的既定工具。然而,在螺旋CT中,对于纵轴上的不同位置,它们会产生不一致的结果。本文解释了斜坡分布是如何作为真实SSP和伪影的叠加而产生的,这些伪影是由于这种特殊几何形状中的困难插值条件导致的切片插值过程引起的。直接结果是,斜坡测试产生空间变化的结果。作为测量切片灵敏度分布的替代工具,建议使用夹在两个圆盘之间的薄高对比度板,这两个圆盘在纵向方向上近似于理想的δ脉冲测试。展示了两种方法得到的SSP;δ方法与理论预测一致,提供了与理论预测一致的、与台面位置无关的平滑对称SSP。得出的结论是,斜坡是确定螺旋CT中SSP的不充分测试对象。