Alexander A A, Eschelman D J, Nazarian L N, Bonn J
Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 May;162(5):1227-30; discussion 1231-2. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.5.8166015.
As an alternative to traditional surgical transrectal and transgluteal drainage, we have examined the efficacy of transrectal sonographically guided drainage for deep pelvic abscesses not accessible by percutaneous transabdominal or transvaginal routes.
In nine patients (five males and four females) 5-51 years old, sonography or CT showed pelvic abscesses that were deemed unapproachable by percutaneous transabdominal or transvaginal routes because of interposed bowel (five patients), presacral location (two patients), or inability of the pediatric vagina to accommodate a transvaginal probe (one patient). One patient refused both transvaginal and transgluteal routes in preference to transrectal drainage. IV sedation (adults) or general anesthesia (children) was used for all drainages. A 7.5-MHz end-fire transrectal sonographic probe fitted with a biopsy guide was inserted into the rectum, and the collection was localized. With sonographic guidance, an 18-gauge needle and then a guidewire were advanced into the collection. Then with fluoroscopic guidance, a self-retaining drainage catheter was placed by using the Seldinger technique.
All nine collections were successfully accessed and effectively drained without complication. Catheters were removed after 1-24 days (mean, 7 days; median, 5 days) without recurrent abscesses.
Transrectal sonographically guided drainage of deep pelvic abscesses is a safe, well-tolerated, effective alternative to the more traditional surgical transrectal drainage or transgluteal approach, especially in pelvic abscesses that cannot be safely drained via a percutaneous transabdominal or transvaginal route.
作为传统经直肠和经臀引流的替代方法,我们研究了经直肠超声引导下对经皮经腹或经阴道途径无法到达的深部盆腔脓肿进行引流的疗效。
9例患者(5例男性,4例女性),年龄5 - 51岁,超声或CT显示盆腔脓肿,因存在肠管阻隔(5例)、骶前位置(2例)或小儿阴道无法容纳经阴道探头(1例),经皮经腹或经阴道途径无法到达。1例患者拒绝经阴道和经臀途径,选择经直肠引流。所有引流均采用静脉镇静(成人)或全身麻醉(儿童)。将配有活检导向器的7.5MHz端射式经直肠超声探头插入直肠,定位脓肿。在超声引导下,将一根18号针然后一根导丝推进脓肿。然后在荧光透视引导下,采用Seldinger技术放置一根自固定引流导管。
所有9个脓肿均成功穿刺并有效引流,无并发症发生。导管在1 - 24天(平均7天;中位数5天)后拔除,无脓肿复发。
经直肠超声引导下对深部盆腔脓肿进行引流是一种安全、耐受性良好、有效的替代传统经直肠引流或经臀引流的方法,尤其适用于无法经皮经腹或经阴道安全引流的盆腔脓肿。