• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算用于接收器操作特性研究的样本量。

Computing sample size for receiver operating characteristic studies.

作者信息

Obuchowski N A

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 1994 Feb;29(2):238-43. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199402000-00020.

DOI:10.1097/00004424-199402000-00020
PMID:8169102
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Hanley and McNeil (1982) proposed a nonparametric method for computing the standard error of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The method has been important in planning the minimum sample size for ROC studies. However, the validity of this method for rating data with various standard deviation ratios has not been investigated.

METHODS

A simulation study was conducted to compare the empirical standard error of the area under the curve with Hanley and McNeil's estimate over a range of parameters. An alternative method of computing the standard error based on a binormal distribution is proposed.

RESULTS

The method of Hanley and McNeil can lead to underestimation of the minimum sample size. The proposed method provides more appropriate estimates of sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

When determining sample size for a study of the area under the ROC curve where rating data are used, the standard error estimator based on the binormal distribution should be used.

摘要

原理与目的

汉利和麦克尼尔(1982年)提出了一种用于计算接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积标准误的非参数方法。该方法在规划ROC研究的最小样本量方面一直很重要。然而,尚未研究该方法对具有各种标准差比率的评级数据的有效性。

方法

进行了一项模拟研究,以比较曲线下面积的经验标准误与汉利和麦克尼尔在一系列参数范围内的估计值。提出了一种基于双正态分布计算标准误的替代方法。

结果

汉利和麦克尼尔的方法可能导致对最小样本量的低估。所提出的方法提供了更合适的样本量估计。

结论

在确定使用评级数据的ROC曲线下面积研究的样本量时,应使用基于双正态分布的标准误估计器。

相似文献

1
Computing sample size for receiver operating characteristic studies.计算用于接收器操作特性研究的样本量。
Invest Radiol. 1994 Feb;29(2):238-43. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199402000-00020.
2
Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.涉及双正态ROC曲线指标的诊断准确性研究的样本量确定
Stat Med. 1997 Jul 15;16(13):1529-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970715)16:13<1529::aid-sim565>3.0.co;2-h.
3
Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.当拟合的双正态曲线呈现不合适的形状时估计ROC曲线下的面积。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(2):209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.诊断试验中相关ROC曲线下面积的分析。
Biometrics. 1997 Mar;53(1):370-82.
5
The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.“恰当”的副法线模型:使用退化数据进行参数化接收者操作特征曲线估计
Acad Radiol. 1997 May;4(5):380-9. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(97)80121-3.
6
Comparison of three methods for estimating the standard error of the area under the curve in ROC analysis of quantitative data.定量数据ROC分析中三种估计曲线下面积标准误方法的比较。
Acad Radiol. 2002 Nov;9(11):1278-85. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80561-5.
7
A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.一种用于比较配对设计中两条ROC曲线下面积的条件非参数检验。
Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar;12(3):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.08.013.
8
A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.一种基于S分布的用于连续诊断测试计算受试者工作特征曲线的新参数方法。
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1213-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.1086.
9
Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model.恰当的接收者操作特征分析:双伽马模型。
Acad Radiol. 1997 Feb;4(2):138-49. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(97)80013-x.
10
Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.经验性接收者操作特征曲线下部分面积的刀切法方差
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):528-541. doi: 10.1177/0962280214551190. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation of the modified Parks classification of cryptoglandular anal fistula to predict failure of healing: the protocol for a retrospective analysis.改良 Parks 隐窝腺性肛瘘分类法预测愈合失败的外部验证:一项回顾性分析方案
Int J Surg Protoc. 2025 Jul 11;29(3):118-121. doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000055. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Evaluating the Performance of Non-invasive Tests for Colorectal Cancer: Statistical Considerations.评估结直肠癌非侵入性检测的性能:统计学考量
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May;70(5):1668-1675. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08800-3. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
Assessment of pancreatic ductal stone density on non-contrast computed tomography for predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
非增强计算机断层扫描评估胰管结石密度以预测体外冲击波碎石术的疗效
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 28;12(2):E274-E281. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-1464. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Concurrent validity and discriminative ability of Dutch performance-based motor tests in 5 to 6 years old children.荷兰基于表现的运动测试在 5 至 6 岁儿童中的同时效性和鉴别能力。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0224722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224722. eCollection 2019.
5
Potential predictors for mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病患者心理应激性心肌缺血的潜在预测因子。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Jun 20;132(12):1390-1399. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000260.
6
Multireader sample size program for diagnostic studies: demonstration and methodology.诊断研究的多读者样本量规划:示例与方法
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Oct;5(4):045503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.045503. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
7
Diagnostic Testing and Decision-Making: Beauty Is Not Just in the Eye of the Beholder.诊断检测与决策:美不只是在观察者眼中。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1085-1091. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003698.
8
Sputum signatures for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with underlying respiratory diseases (SPARED): study protocol for a prospective diagnostic trial.潜在呼吸疾病患者侵袭性肺曲霉病的痰液特征(SPARED):前瞻性诊断试验研究方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3180-z.
9
Simulation of complex data structures for planning of studies with focus on biomarker comparison.用于以生物标志物比较为重点的研究规划的复杂数据结构模拟。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jun 13;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0364-y.
10
Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers.计算机辅助检测在新手和有经验的乳腺 MRI 读者中的准确性和解释时间。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jun;200(6):W683-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8394.