Dahl B L, Tronstad L
J Oral Rehabil. 1976 Jan;3(1):19-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00926.x.
The biological compatibility of an experimental glass ionomer (silicopolyacrylate) cement has been assessed in in vitro (cell culture) and in vivo (monkey teeth) tests. For comparison a conventional silicate cement (Super Syntrex) was included in the in vivo experiments. In vitro, the glass ionomer cement was toxic when freshly prepared. The toxicity decreased, however, with increasing setting time. In experiments with prolonged cell-material contact time with specimens which had set for 24 h, the material appeared to be non-toxic. The in vivo experiments confirmed previous reports concerning unfavourable pulp reaction caused by silicate cement, while the glass ionomer cement caused mainly a mild pulp reaction after 8 days of observation. Unfortunately no longer-term observations were obtained since the material had been washed out of the cavities within 36 days.
一种实验性玻璃离子(硅聚丙烯酸酯)水门汀的生物相容性已在体外(细胞培养)和体内(猴牙)试验中进行了评估。为作比较,体内实验中纳入了一种传统的硅酸盐水泥(超级合成物)。在体外,新制备的玻璃离子水门汀具有毒性。然而,随着凝固时间的增加,毒性降低。在与已凝固24小时的标本延长细胞-材料接触时间的实验中,该材料似乎无毒。体内实验证实了先前有关硅酸盐水泥引起不良牙髓反应的报道,而玻璃离子水门汀在观察8天后主要引起轻微的牙髓反应。遗憾的是,由于该材料在36天内已从窝洞中被冲洗掉,未获得更长时间的观察结果。