Suppr超能文献

复发性静脉曲张:大隐静脉股静脉交界处的评估

Recurrent varicose veins: assessment of the saphenofemoral junction.

作者信息

Bradbury A W, Stonebridge P A, Callam M J, Walker A J, Allan P L, Beggs I, Ruckley C V

机构信息

University Department of Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1994 Mar;81(3):373-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810316.

Abstract

Thirty-six consecutive unselected patients, who had apparently previously undergone saphenofemoral ligation for primary uncomplicated long saphenous varicosities and who had then re-presented with recurrent thigh varices emanating from the groin, underwent preoperative clinical assessment, hand-held Doppler and duplex ultrasonographic examination and varicography to establish the presence or absence of saphenofemoral incompetence as the cause of recurrence. All patients underwent reexploration of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) via a lateral approach. Twenty-six patients had an intact SFJ (type I recurrence) and ten had varices arising from either a thigh perforator, or from abdominal or perineal veins (type II recurrence). Clinical examination alone was poor at distinguishing type I from type II recurrence. Doppler ultrasonography was sensitive (88 per cent) but non-specific (40 per cent). In contrast, duplex scanning was insensitive (42 per cent) but extremely specific (100 per cent) and accurate, with a positive predictive value of 100 per cent. Varicography also had a specificity and positive predictive value of 100 per cent, a sensitivity of 73 per cent and in addition provided a precise anatomical 'road-map'. A combination of clinical examination and hand-held Doppler ultrasonography seems to be the most appropriate first-line method of preoperative assessment in these patients. Duplex ultrasonography, if available, will provide additional useful information about both the SFJ and the presence of thigh perforators. Contrast examination may be reserved for patients who have equivocal results on non-invasive investigations, who have had more than one previous groin operation or who have, in addition, deep venous disease.

摘要

36例连续入选的患者,此前显然因原发性单纯性大隐静脉曲张接受了大隐静脉股静脉结扎术,之后又因腹股沟处复发性大腿静脉曲张前来就诊。这些患者均接受了术前临床评估、手持多普勒超声和双功超声检查以及静脉造影,以确定股隐静脉瓣膜功能不全是否为复发原因。所有患者均通过外侧入路对股隐静脉交界处(SFJ)进行了再次探查。26例患者的SFJ完整(I型复发),10例患者的静脉曲张源于大腿穿支静脉或腹部或会阴静脉(II型复发)。仅靠临床检查很难区分I型和II型复发。多普勒超声检查敏感度高(88%)但特异性低(40%)。相比之下,双功扫描敏感度低(42%)但特异性极高(100%)且准确,阳性预测值为100%。静脉造影的特异性和阳性预测值也为100%,敏感度为73%,此外还提供了精确的解剖“路线图”。临床检查和手持多普勒超声检查相结合似乎是这些患者术前评估最合适的一线方法。如有条件,双功超声检查将提供有关SFJ和大腿穿支静脉情况的额外有用信息。对于非侵入性检查结果不明确、此前腹股沟手术超过一次或同时患有深静脉疾病的患者,可考虑进行造影检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验