Lee A S, MacLean J C, Newton D A
Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 May;76(3):352-6.
There is still some controversy about the reduction of unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations in the cervical spine. We have reviewed the notes and radiographs of 210 such patients; reduction was attempted by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) in 91, and by rapid traction under sedation in 119, using weights up to 150 lb (68 kg). Our results suggest that early reduction in patients with neurological deficit gives the best chance of neurological recovery, that rapid traction is more often successful than MUA, and that traction is safer than MUA. We found that the use of heavy weights with close monitoring was safe and brought about reduction in an average time of 21 minutes. We recommend this technique for the reduction of all cervical facet dislocations.
颈椎单侧和双侧小关节脱位的复位仍存在一些争议。我们回顾了210例此类患者的病历和X光片;其中91例尝试在麻醉下手法复位(MUA),119例在镇静下使用高达150磅(68公斤)的重量进行快速牵引。我们的结果表明,有神经功能缺损的患者早期复位能提供最佳的神经恢复机会,快速牵引比MUA更常成功,且牵引比MUA更安全。我们发现,在密切监测下使用重物是安全的,平均21分钟即可实现复位。我们推荐这种技术用于所有颈椎小关节脱位的复位。