Orebaugh S L, Bradford S M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92134-5000.
Am J Emerg Med. 1994 May;12(3):284-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90139-2.
Midazolam is a water-soluble benzodiazepine proven to be efficacious in sedation, hypnosis, and induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Because of its water solubility, it is a desirable drug for the control of status epilepticus when intravenous (IV) access is not obtainable. This study compares intramuscular (IM) versus IV routes of administration of midazolam in the control of tonic-clonic activity produced by chemically induced generalized seizures in a swine model. When midazolam was administered by IV route, tonic-clonic activity lasted a mean of 34 +/- 5.4 seconds, and when administered by IM route, the tonic-clonic activity lasted a mean of 116 +/- 41 seconds. Both were considerably abbreviated when compared with the expected duration of pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in the swine model. Serum levels of midazolam achieved by the IV route were considerably higher than those achieved by the IM route. It is concluded that midazolam is effective in the control of tonic-clonic manifestations of generalized seizures when administered by the IV or the IM route and that no correlation exists between serum levels achieved and the time to control the seizure.
咪达唑仑是一种水溶性苯二氮䓬类药物,已被证明在镇静、催眠以及麻醉诱导和维持方面有效。由于其水溶性,当无法获得静脉通路时,它是控制癫痫持续状态的理想药物。本研究比较了在猪模型中,咪达唑仑肌内注射(IM)与静脉注射(IV)途径在控制化学诱导的全身性惊厥所产生的强直阵挛活动方面的效果。当通过静脉途径给予咪达唑仑时,强直阵挛活动平均持续34±5.4秒,而通过肌内途径给药时,强直阵挛活动平均持续116±41秒。与猪模型中戊四氮诱导惊厥的预期持续时间相比,两者均显著缩短。静脉途径所达到的咪达唑仑血清水平显著高于肌内途径。结论是,咪达唑仑通过静脉或肌内途径给药时,在控制全身性惊厥的强直阵挛表现方面是有效的,并且所达到的血清水平与控制惊厥的时间之间不存在相关性。