Weitzenblum E, Apprill M, Oswald M, Chaouat A, Imbs J L
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Chest. 1994 May;105(5):1377-82. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.5.1377.
We have investigated pulmonary hemodynamics in 16 patients with COPD with respiratory insufficiency, exhibiting marked peripheral edema. All the patients had previously undergone, within the last 6 months (T1), a right heart catheterization, in a stable state of their disease, when they were free of edema. Patients were subdivided into two groups according to the level of right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) during the episode of edema (T2): patients with a markedly elevated RVEDP (> 12 mm Hg) indicating the presence of right ventricular failure (RVF) = group 1, n = 9; patients with a normal or slightly elevated RVEDP (< 12 mm Hg) = group 2 (no RVF), n = 7. In group 1 pulmonary artery mean pressure (PAP) increased very significantly from T1 (27 +/- 5) to T2 (40 +/- 6 mm Hg, p < 0.001) as did RVEDP, from 7.5 +/- 3.9 to 13.4 +/- 1.2 mm Hg (p < 0.001). These hemodynamic changes paralleled a marked worsening of arterial blood gases, PaO2 falling from 63 +/- 4 to 49 +/- 7 mm Hg (p < 0.01) and PaCO2 increasing from 46 +/- 7 to 59 +/- 14 mm Hg (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in group 2, PAP was stable during the episode of edema (from 20 +/- 6 to 21 +/- 5 mm Hg), as was RVEDP (from 5.5 +/- 2.4 to 5.1 +/- 1.5 mm Hg), and changes in arterial blood gases from T1 to T2 were small and nonsignificant. It is concluded that RVF is effectively present in at least some patients with COPD with peripheral edema and is associated with a significant increase of PAP from baseline, probably accounted for by hypoxic vasoconstriction. Thus, pressure overload may contribute to the development of RVF. In other patients there are no hemodynamic signs of RVF, PAP is stable, and the origin of edema is not well understood.
我们对16例患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)且呼吸功能不全并伴有明显外周水肿的患者进行了肺血流动力学研究。所有患者在过去6个月内(T1),在疾病稳定且无水肿状态下均接受过右心导管检查。根据水肿发作期间(T2)右心室舒张末期压力(RVEDP)水平,将患者分为两组:RVEDP显著升高(>12 mmHg)提示存在右心室衰竭(RVF)的患者 = 第1组,n = 9;RVEDP正常或轻度升高(<12 mmHg)的患者 = 第2组(无RVF),n = 7。在第1组中,肺动脉平均压(PAP)从T1时的(27±5)显著升高至T2时的(40±6 mmHg,p<0.001),RVEDP也从7.5±3.9升高至13.4±1.2 mmHg(p<0.001)。这些血流动力学变化与动脉血气的明显恶化平行,动脉血氧分压(PaO2)从63±4降至49±7 mmHg(p<0.01),动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)从46±7升至59±14 mmHg(p<0.01)。另一方面,在第2组中,水肿发作期间PAP稳定(从20±6至21±5 mmHg),RVEDP也稳定(从5.5±2.4至5.1±1.5 mmHg),从T1到T2的动脉血气变化很小且无统计学意义。结论是,至少部分伴有外周水肿的COPD患者存在有效的RVF,且与基线时PAP的显著升高相关,这可能是由缺氧性血管收缩所致。因此,压力超负荷可能促成RVF的发生。在其他患者中,没有RVF的血流动力学迹象,PAP稳定,水肿的成因尚不清楚。