Sanjuán R, Morell S, Samper J, García Civera R, Ruiz R, Muñoz J, Botella S, López Merino V
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia.
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1994 Mar;47(3):157-64.
Reentrant ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation probably have different electrophysiological bases. Regional conduction delay during sinus rhythm seems to be greatest in patients with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia than in patients with spontaneous sustained ventricular fibrillation. We investigated the prevalence and significance of late potentials in patients with documented VT or VF in the setting of coronary diseases and other organic heart diseases.
Nineteen patients with a history of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia (11 patients) or fibrillation (8 patients) were studied with signal-averaged ECG. All patients had been resuscitated of sudden cardiac death. All recordings were made in sinus rhythm in an antiarrhythmic free state following the recommendations of the Committee of the European Society of Cardiology for data acquisition and analysis of ventricular late potentials using Signal Averaged Electrocardiography. The relationship between this late potentials and tachyarrhythmia inducibility during electrophysiologic study were established.
Abnormal late potentials were found in 79% of patients with sudden cardiac death. Patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia had a longer ventricular activation time in sinus rhythm than did patients with spontaneous ventricular fibrillation, but this difference did not reach statistic significance. The only analysis of late potentials could not discern the mechanism of sudden cardiac death. However when sudden cardiac death was caused by a spontaneous ventricular tachycardia, a good correlation between abnormal late potentials and induced ventricular tachycardia by programmed stimulation was found. Quantitative indices of late potentials did not correlate with ventricular tachycardia cycle length.
折返性室性心动过速和颤动可能具有不同的电生理基础。与自发性持续性心室颤动患者相比,自发性持续性室性心动过速患者在窦性心律时的局部传导延迟似乎最大。我们调查了冠心病和其他器质性心脏病患者中记录到室性心动过速(VT)或室颤(VF)时晚电位的发生率及其意义。
对19例有自发性持续性室性心动过速病史(11例)或颤动病史(8例)的患者进行了信号平均心电图研究。所有患者均从心脏性猝死中复苏。所有记录均在窦性心律下,在无抗心律失常药物的状态下进行,遵循欧洲心脏病学会委员会关于使用信号平均心电图采集和分析心室晚电位的数据采集和分析建议。确定了这种晚电位与电生理研究期间室性心律失常诱发性之间的关系。
79%的心脏性猝死患者发现有异常晚电位。自发性室性心动过速患者在窦性心律时的心室激动时间比自发性心室颤动患者长,但这种差异未达到统计学意义。仅对晚电位的分析无法辨别心脏性猝死的机制。然而,当心脏性猝死由自发性室性心动过速引起时,发现异常晚电位与程控刺激诱发的室性心动过速之间有良好的相关性。晚电位的定量指标与室性心动过速周期长度无关。
1)我们发现心脏性猝死患者中异常晚电位的发生率升高,2)仅当心脏性猝死的机制是自发性室性心动过速时,我们才能在电生理研究中将异常晚电位与诱发的室性心动过速相关联。