el-Sherif N, Turitto G, Fontaine J M
Department of Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn.
Herz. 1988 Jun;13(3):204-14.
Currently, there are three prognostic indicators of ventricular electrical instability: long-term ambulatory ECG recording, programmed electrical stimulation and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Several clinical studies have suggested that frequent and complex ventricular premature contractions in patients with organic heart disease may identify future cardiac events, including sudden cardiac death although, with respect to prognosis, it is not likely that any grading system based on the ambulatory ECG will be without meaningful limitations. No study has adequately tested the hypothesis that decreasing ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction reduces mortality. The inducibility of ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation is regarded as an independent risk factor for sudden death. Predominantly due to the lack of standardized protocol and definitions, the actual relevance of current literature remains somewhat compromised. The indication for antiarrhythmic treatment in those patients in whom ventricular tachycardia can be induced has not been established with certainty since the effects of therapy on the prognosis are unknown. For patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias in whom sustained ventricular tachycardia cannot be induced, antiarrhythmic drug treatment does not appear indicated. Based on a number of studies, the presence of late potentials in the signal-averaged ECG has also been shown to be a meaningful prognostic indicator. The signal-averaged ECG, however, is not only subject to various technical problems but is also encumbered by limitations arising from electrophysiologic considerations. While no relationship could be established between late potentials and complex ventricular arrhythmias in the ambulatory ECG within the first two months after acute myocardial infarction, there was, however, a correlation between late potentials and the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation. Consequently, the signal-averaged ECG may serve as a screening test to identify patients who should subsequently undergo programmed electrical stimulation for arrhythmia assessment or guided institution of treatment provided this proves to be effective in reducing the risk of future major arrhythmic events.
目前,有三种心室电不稳定的预后指标:长期动态心电图记录、程控电刺激和信号平均心电图。多项临床研究表明,器质性心脏病患者频繁且复杂的室性早搏可能预示未来的心脏事件,包括心源性猝死。不过,就预后而言,任何基于动态心电图的分级系统都可能存在显著局限性。尚无研究充分验证急性心肌梗死后减少室性心律失常可降低死亡率这一假说。程控电刺激期间室性心动过速的可诱导性被视为猝死的独立危险因素。主要由于缺乏标准化方案和定义,当前文献的实际相关性仍有所欠缺。对于能诱发出室性心动过速的患者,抗心律失常治疗的指征尚未明确确定,因为治疗对预后的影响尚不清楚。对于不能诱发出持续性室性心动过速的复杂室性心律失常患者,似乎无需进行抗心律失常药物治疗。基于多项研究,信号平均心电图中晚期电位的存在也已被证明是一个有意义的预后指标。然而,信号平均心电图不仅存在各种技术问题,还受到电生理因素导致的局限性的影响。虽然在急性心肌梗死后的头两个月内,动态心电图中的晚期电位与复杂室性心律失常之间未发现关联,但晚期电位与程控电刺激期间室性心动过速的可诱导性之间存在相关性。因此,如果信号平均心电图被证明能有效降低未来重大心律失常事件的风险,那么它可作为一种筛查测试,用于识别那些随后应接受程控电刺激以进行心律失常评估或指导治疗的患者。