• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对措施的效标效度。

Criterion validity of a coping measure.

作者信息

Amirkhan J H

机构信息

California State University, Long Beach.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):242-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_6.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_6
PMID:8189334
Abstract

A paucity of evidence for the validity of coping questionnaires prompted investigation of the Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI; Amirkhan, 1990), a self-report measure of three fundamental modes of coping that has already demonstrated considerable psychometric strength. Three tests of criterion-related validity were performed, with variations in both the types of stressors and respondents sampled. In the first, CSI scores were found to correspond to coping choices made under the threat of electric shock in a laboratory. In the second and third, the CSI correctly identified coping patterns associated with participation in educational and therapeutic programs in more natural settings. Results confirmed the validity and wide applicability of the CSI and suggested avenues for future basic and applied research.

摘要

应对问卷有效性的证据不足,促使人们对应对策略指标(CSI;Amirkhan,1990)进行研究,这是一种对三种基本应对方式的自我报告测量方法,已显示出相当强的心理测量优势。进行了三项与标准相关的效度测试,压力源类型和抽样受访者均有所不同。在第一项测试中,发现CSI得分与实验室中电击威胁下做出的应对选择相对应。在第二项和第三项测试中,CSI正确识别了在更自然环境中参与教育和治疗项目所关联的应对模式。结果证实了CSI的有效性和广泛适用性,并为未来的基础研究和应用研究指明了方向。

相似文献

1
Criterion validity of a coping measure.应对措施的效标效度。
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):242-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_6.
2
Validity and reliability of the brief COPE in carers of people with dementia: the LASER-AD Study.简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)在痴呆症患者照料者中的效度和信度:LASER-AD研究
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Nov;196(11):838-43. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31818b504c.
3
Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses.青少年对压力的反应:应对方式和非自主应激反应的测量
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Dec;68(6):976-92.
4
The coping resources inventory for stress: a measure of perceived resourcefulness.压力应对资源量表:一种感知足智多谋程度的测量工具。
J Clin Psychol. 1993 Nov;49(6):815-30.
5
Development and validation of a Coping with Discrimination Scale: factor structure, reliability, and validity.应对歧视量表的编制与验证:结构因素、信度和效度。
J Couns Psychol. 2010 Jul;57(3):328-44. doi: 10.1037/a0019969.
6
The Adolescent Relapse Coping Questionnaire: psychometric validation.青少年复发应对问卷:心理测量学验证
J Stud Alcohol. 1996 Jan;57(1):40-6. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.40.
7
Coping and MCMI-II symptom scales.
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Sep;50(5):727-36.
8
Adolescent coping scales: a critical psychometric review.青少年应对量表:一项关键的心理测量学综述。
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Dec;49(6):533-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00669.x. Epub 2008 May 16.
9
Validation evidence for three coping measures.三种应对措施的验证证据。
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):434-55. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_5.
10
Assessment of coping: an empirical illustration of the problem of inapplicable items.应对方式的评估:不适用项目问题的实证例证。
J Pers Assess. 1991 Aug;57(1):162-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Psychometric Properties of Coping Scales towards Adherence to Pharmacological Treatment, Heart-healthy Eating and Cardiovascular Physical Exercise.应对坚持药物治疗、心脏健康饮食和心血管体育锻炼的应对量表的编制及心理测量学特性
Psychol Russ. 2024 Sep 15;17(3):97-113. doi: 10.11621/pir.2024.0307. eCollection 2024.
2
Workplace trauma and professional quality of Life in clinical and forensic psychiatry: the CRITIC study.临床与法医精神病学中的工作场所创伤与职业生活质量:CRITIC研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;15:1228335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1228335. eCollection 2024.
3
Inspired in Adversity: How Inspiration Mediates the Effects of Emotions on Coping Strategies.
逆境中的灵感:灵感如何调节情绪对应对策略的影响。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Dec 22;16:5185-5196. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S425643. eCollection 2023.
4
A mixed method study exploring gender differences in dementia caregiving.一项混合方法研究,旨在探索痴呆症护理中的性别差异。
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1862-1885. doi: 10.1177/14713012231201595. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
Skillful Sailors of Impossible Seas: Exploring Black Older Adults' Experience with Chronic Stress and Mental Health.驾驭不可能之海的娴熟水手:探索年长黑人成年人的慢性压力与心理健康经历
Currents (Ann Arbor). 2022 Winter;2(1):12-21. doi: 10.3998/ncidcurrents.1773.
6
Stress is a Latent Construct: Exploring the Differential Experience of Stress and Discrimination on Depressive Symptoms Among Black Older Adults.压力是一种潜在的结构:探究黑人老年人中压力和歧视对抑郁症状的不同影响。
J Aging Health. 2022 Jun;34(3):334-346. doi: 10.1177/08982643221086333. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Associations of conscientiousness with cardiac troponin T and stress coping responses in a teacher cohort: the SABPA prospective cohort study.尽责性与教师队列中心肌钙蛋白 T 和应激应对反应的关系:SABPA 前瞻性队列研究。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2022;33(4):169-178. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2021-058. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Strengths despite stress: Social-structural stressors and psychosocial buffers of depressive symptoms among U.S. Black men.压力下的坚韧:美国黑人男性抑郁症状的社会结构性压力源和心理社会缓冲因素。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2022;92(2):133-143. doi: 10.1037/ort0000595. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
9
Measuring More Than Exposure: Does Stress Appraisal Matter for Black-White Differences in Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults?测量的不止是暴露因素:压力评估对老年人焦虑和抑郁症状的黑白差异有影响吗?
Innov Aging. 2020 Sep 7;4(5):igaa040. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa040. eCollection 2020.
10
Coping strategies as moderating factors to compassion fatigue among critical care nurses.应对策略作为缓和重症监护护士同情疲劳的因素。
Brain Behav. 2019 Apr;9(4):e01264. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1264. Epub 2019 Mar 18.