Kamenskiy Alexey V, Pipinos Iraklis I, MacTaggart Jason N, Kazmi Syed A Jaffar, Dzenis Yuris A
Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
J Biomech Eng. 2011 Nov;133(11):111008. doi: 10.1115/1.4005434.
Patch angioplasty is the most common technique used for the performance of carotid endarterectomy. A large number of patching materials are available for use while new materials are being continuously developed. Surprisingly little is known about the mechanical properties of these materials and how these properties compare with those of the carotid artery wall. Mismatch of the mechanical properties can produce mechanical and hemodynamic effects that may compromise the long-term patency of the endarterectomized arterial segment. The aim of this paper was to systematically evaluate and compare the biaxial mechanical behavior of the most commonly used patching materials. We compared PTFE (n = 1), Dacron (n = 2), bovine pericardium (n = 10), autogenous greater saphenous vein (n = 10), and autogenous external jugular vein (n = 9) with the wall of the common carotid artery (n = 18). All patching materials were found to be significantly stiffer than the carotid wall in both the longitudinal and circumferential directions. Synthetic patches demonstrated the most mismatch in stiffness values and vein patches the least mismatch in stiffness values compared to those of the native carotid artery. All biological materials, including the carotid artery, demonstrated substantial nonlinearity, anisotropy, and variability; however, the behavior of biological and biologically-derived patches was both qualitatively and quantitatively different from the behavior of the carotid wall. The majority of carotid arteries tested were stiffer in the circumferential direction, while the opposite anisotropy was observed for all types of vein patches and bovine pericardium. The rates of increase in the nonlinear stiffness over the physiological stress range were also different for the carotid and patching materials. Several carotid wall samples exhibited reverse anisotropy compared to the average behavior of the carotid tissue. A similar characteristic was observed for two of 19 vein patches. The obtained results quantify, for the first time, significant mechanical dissimilarity of the currently available patching materials and the carotid artery. The results can be used as guidance for designing more efficient patches with mechanical properties resembling those of the carotid wall. The presented systematic comparative mechanical analysis of the existing patching materials provides valuable information for patch selection in the daily practice of carotid surgery and can be used in future clinical studies comparing the efficacy of different patches in the performance of carotid endarterectomy.
补片血管成形术是颈动脉内膜切除术最常用的技术。有大量的补片材料可供使用,同时新材料也在不断研发。令人惊讶的是,对于这些材料的力学性能以及它们与颈动脉壁力学性能的比较了解甚少。力学性能不匹配会产生力学和血流动力学效应,这可能会影响内膜切除术后动脉段的长期通畅性。本文的目的是系统地评估和比较最常用补片材料的双轴力学行为。我们将聚四氟乙烯(n = 1)、涤纶(n = 2)、牛心包(n = 10)、自体大隐静脉(n = 10)和自体颈外静脉(n = 9)与颈总动脉壁(n = 18)进行了比较。所有补片材料在纵向和周向方向上都比颈动脉壁明显更硬。与天然颈动脉相比,合成补片的刚度值差异最大,静脉补片的刚度值差异最小。所有生物材料,包括颈动脉,都表现出显著的非线性、各向异性和变异性;然而,生物和生物衍生补片的行为在定性和定量上都与颈动脉壁的行为不同。大多数测试的颈动脉在周向方向上更硬,而所有类型的静脉补片和牛心包则观察到相反的各向异性。在生理应力范围内,颈动脉和补片材料的非线性刚度增加率也不同。与颈动脉组织的平均行为相比,几个颈动脉壁样本表现出反向各向异性。在19个静脉补片中,有2个观察到类似特征。所获得的结果首次量化了目前可用补片材料与颈动脉之间显著的力学差异。这些结果可作为设计力学性能与颈动脉壁相似的更高效补片的指导。对现有补片材料进行的系统比较力学分析为颈动脉手术的日常实践中的补片选择提供了有价值的信息,并可用于未来比较不同补片在颈动脉内膜切除术中疗效的临床研究。