• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.颈动脉壁组织与用于颈动脉补片血管成形术的生物及合成材料的双轴力学行为对比分析。
J Biomech Eng. 2011 Nov;133(11):111008. doi: 10.1115/1.4005434.
2
Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty.用于颈动脉修补成形术的不同类型补丁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD000071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000071.pub4.
3
Hemodynamically motivated choice of patch angioplasty for the performance of carotid endarterectomy.基于血流动力学选择补片成形术用于颈动脉内膜切除术。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Feb;41(2):263-78. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0640-2. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
4
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative based on patch type.基于补片类型的血管质量倡议中颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;71(4):1260-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.063. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
Prospective randomized trial of ACUSEAL versus Vascu-Guard patching in carotid endarterectomy.ACUSEAL与Vascu-Guard贴片在颈动脉内膜切除术应用中的前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;28(6):1530-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.02.017. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
6
A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing bovine pericardium and other patch materials for carotid endarterectomy.一项比较牛心包和其他补片材料用于颈动脉内膜切除术的随机试验的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1241-1256.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.023.
7
Carotid endarterectomy outcome with vein or Dacron graft patch angioplasty and internal carotid artery shortening.采用静脉或涤纶补片血管成形术及颈内动脉缩短术的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Apr;29(4):654-64. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70311-3.
8
Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty.用于颈动脉补片血管成形术的不同类型补片。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000071.pub2.
9
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术期间,斑块血管成形术与一期缝合及不同类型补片材料的随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec;40(6):1126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.048.
10
Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: long-term follow-up.采用一期缝合、大隐静脉、颈静脉及聚四氟乙烯补片血管成形术行颈动脉内膜切除术的前瞻性随机试验:长期随访
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Feb;27(2):222-32; discussion 233-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70353-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Micropatterned cell sheets as structural building blocks for biomimetic vascular patches.微图案化细胞片作为仿生血管补片的结构构建块。
Biomaterials. 2018 Oct;181:126-139. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.047. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
2
Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: Does the flow really change? An Echo-Color-Doppler analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术:血流真的会改变吗?一项超声彩色多普勒分析。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;31(4):773-81. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0623-0. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
Passive biaxial mechanical properties and in vivo axial pre-stretch of the diseased human femoropopliteal and tibial arteries.病变人类股腘动脉和胫动脉的被动双轴力学性能及体内轴向预拉伸
Acta Biomater. 2014 Mar;10(3):1301-13. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.027. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
4
A mathematical evaluation of hemodynamic parameters after carotid eversion and conventional patch angioplasty.颈动脉外翻与常规补片血管成形术后血流动力学参数的数学评估。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Sep 1;305(5):H716-24. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00034.2013. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
Hemodynamically motivated choice of patch angioplasty for the performance of carotid endarterectomy.基于血流动力学选择补片成形术用于颈动脉内膜切除术。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Feb;41(2):263-78. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0640-2. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting? Matching the patient to the intervention.颈动脉内膜切除术还是颈动脉支架置入术?使患者与干预措施相匹配。
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;22(2):124-36. doi: 10.1177/1531003510381136.
2
Biaxial biomechanical properties of self-assembly tissue-engineered blood vessels.自组装组织工程血管的双轴生物力学特性。
J R Soc Interface. 2011 Feb 6;8(55):244-56. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0228. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
3
Biaxial mechanical properties of intact and layer-dissected human carotid arteries at physiological and supraphysiological loadings.在生理和超生理负荷下完整和分层解剖的人颈动脉的双轴力学性能。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010 Mar;298(3):H898-912. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00378.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
4
A comparison of mechanical properties of materials used in aortic arch reconstruction.主动脉弓重建中所用材料的力学性能比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Nov;88(5):1484-91. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.023.
5
Finite element model of the patched human carotid.修补后的人体颈动脉有限元模型。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009 Dec;43(6):533-41. doi: 10.1177/1538574409345030. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
6
Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects.颈动脉内膜切除术的补片:当前材料与前景
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul;50(1):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.062.
7
Mechanical properties of completely autologous human tissue engineered blood vessels compared to human saphenous vein and mammary artery.完全自体人组织工程血管与人体大隐静脉和乳内动脉相比的力学性能。
Biomaterials. 2009 Mar;30(8):1542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
8
Results of carotid endarterectomy with pericardial patch angioplasty: rate and predictors of restenosis.采用心包补片血管成形术的颈动脉内膜切除术结果:再狭窄率及预测因素
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Nov;21(6):767-71. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.07.005.
9
Prospective randomized trial of ACUSEAL (Gore-Tex) versus Hemashield-Finesse patching during carotid endarterectomy: early results.颈动脉内膜切除术期间ACUSEAL(戈尔特斯)与Hemashield-Finesse补片的前瞻性随机试验:早期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2007 May;45(5):881-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.038.
10
ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on carotid stenting.
Vasc Med. 2007 Feb;12(1):35-83. doi: 10.1177/1358863X06076103.

颈动脉壁组织与用于颈动脉补片血管成形术的生物及合成材料的双轴力学行为对比分析。

Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

作者信息

Kamenskiy Alexey V, Pipinos Iraklis I, MacTaggart Jason N, Kazmi Syed A Jaffar, Dzenis Yuris A

机构信息

Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.

出版信息

J Biomech Eng. 2011 Nov;133(11):111008. doi: 10.1115/1.4005434.

DOI:10.1115/1.4005434
PMID:22168740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5413157/
Abstract

Patch angioplasty is the most common technique used for the performance of carotid endarterectomy. A large number of patching materials are available for use while new materials are being continuously developed. Surprisingly little is known about the mechanical properties of these materials and how these properties compare with those of the carotid artery wall. Mismatch of the mechanical properties can produce mechanical and hemodynamic effects that may compromise the long-term patency of the endarterectomized arterial segment. The aim of this paper was to systematically evaluate and compare the biaxial mechanical behavior of the most commonly used patching materials. We compared PTFE (n  =  1), Dacron (n  =  2), bovine pericardium (n  =  10), autogenous greater saphenous vein (n  =  10), and autogenous external jugular vein (n  =  9) with the wall of the common carotid artery (n  =  18). All patching materials were found to be significantly stiffer than the carotid wall in both the longitudinal and circumferential directions. Synthetic patches demonstrated the most mismatch in stiffness values and vein patches the least mismatch in stiffness values compared to those of the native carotid artery. All biological materials, including the carotid artery, demonstrated substantial nonlinearity, anisotropy, and variability; however, the behavior of biological and biologically-derived patches was both qualitatively and quantitatively different from the behavior of the carotid wall. The majority of carotid arteries tested were stiffer in the circumferential direction, while the opposite anisotropy was observed for all types of vein patches and bovine pericardium. The rates of increase in the nonlinear stiffness over the physiological stress range were also different for the carotid and patching materials. Several carotid wall samples exhibited reverse anisotropy compared to the average behavior of the carotid tissue. A similar characteristic was observed for two of 19 vein patches. The obtained results quantify, for the first time, significant mechanical dissimilarity of the currently available patching materials and the carotid artery. The results can be used as guidance for designing more efficient patches with mechanical properties resembling those of the carotid wall. The presented systematic comparative mechanical analysis of the existing patching materials provides valuable information for patch selection in the daily practice of carotid surgery and can be used in future clinical studies comparing the efficacy of different patches in the performance of carotid endarterectomy.

摘要

补片血管成形术是颈动脉内膜切除术最常用的技术。有大量的补片材料可供使用,同时新材料也在不断研发。令人惊讶的是,对于这些材料的力学性能以及它们与颈动脉壁力学性能的比较了解甚少。力学性能不匹配会产生力学和血流动力学效应,这可能会影响内膜切除术后动脉段的长期通畅性。本文的目的是系统地评估和比较最常用补片材料的双轴力学行为。我们将聚四氟乙烯(n = 1)、涤纶(n = 2)、牛心包(n = 10)、自体大隐静脉(n = 10)和自体颈外静脉(n = 9)与颈总动脉壁(n = 18)进行了比较。所有补片材料在纵向和周向方向上都比颈动脉壁明显更硬。与天然颈动脉相比,合成补片的刚度值差异最大,静脉补片的刚度值差异最小。所有生物材料,包括颈动脉,都表现出显著的非线性、各向异性和变异性;然而,生物和生物衍生补片的行为在定性和定量上都与颈动脉壁的行为不同。大多数测试的颈动脉在周向方向上更硬,而所有类型的静脉补片和牛心包则观察到相反的各向异性。在生理应力范围内,颈动脉和补片材料的非线性刚度增加率也不同。与颈动脉组织的平均行为相比,几个颈动脉壁样本表现出反向各向异性。在19个静脉补片中,有2个观察到类似特征。所获得的结果首次量化了目前可用补片材料与颈动脉之间显著的力学差异。这些结果可作为设计力学性能与颈动脉壁相似的更高效补片的指导。对现有补片材料进行的系统比较力学分析为颈动脉手术的日常实践中的补片选择提供了有价值的信息,并可用于未来比较不同补片在颈动脉内膜切除术中疗效的临床研究。