Carrizosa J, Kaye D
J Lab Clin Med. 1976 Jul;88(1):132-41.
The recognition of enterococci highly resistant to streptomycin (S) raises questions concerning the choice of aminoglycoside in treatment of enterococcal endocarditis. Left-sided endocarditis was induced in rabbits with an S-sensitive enterococcus, strain 1 (inhibited by 125 mug per milliliter S), and an S-resistant enterococcus, strain 2 (resistant to 7,500 mug per milliliter S). Treatment was initiated 6 hours, 24 hours, or 3 days after infection with procaine penicillin (P) alone, P plus S, P plus gentamicin (G), or P plus sisomicin (Si). In rabbits infected with strain 1 for 6 hours before treatment, most vegetations were sterile after 3 days therapy with each combination but not with P alone which had mean log10 colony forming units per gram of vegetation (log CFU) of 2.5. With strain 2 the log CFU were lower (1.9 to 2.6) with each combination than with P (4.0). In rabbits infected with strain 1 for 24 hours and then given 9 days of therapy, the log CFU were decreased with each combination (2.0 to 2.3) as compared with P alone (4.9). With strain 2 the log CFU were lower with P plus G or Si (1.5 and 2.5) than with P alone or P plus S (4.5 AND 4.1). In rabbits infected with strain 1 for 3 days and then given 7 days of therapy, the log CFU were 4.1 to 5.5 with each combination and 6.7 with P. With strain 2 the log CFU was 4.0 with P plus G or Si as compared with 6.4 and 6.7 for P or P + S. These studies showed little difference between the 3 antibiotic combinations with the S-sensitive enterococcus or in early (6-hour) endocarditis caused by the S-resistant enterococcus. There was a large advantage of P plus G and P plus Si over P + S in more established (24 hour or 3 day) endocarditis caused by the S-resistant enterococcus.
对链霉素(S)高度耐药的肠球菌的发现,引发了关于治疗肠球菌性心内膜炎时氨基糖苷类药物选择的问题。用一株对S敏感的肠球菌(菌株1,每毫升125微克S可抑制其生长)和一株对S耐药的肠球菌(菌株2,每毫升7500微克S仍对其耐药)在兔子身上诱发左侧心内膜炎。在感染后6小时、24小时或3天开始治疗,治疗方案包括单独使用普鲁卡因青霉素(P)、P加S、P加庆大霉素(G)或P加西索米星(Si)。在治疗前感染菌株1达6小时的兔子中,每种联合用药治疗3天后,大多数赘生物无菌,但单独使用P时并非如此,单独使用P时每克赘生物的平均log10集落形成单位(log CFU)为2.5。对于菌株2,每种联合用药的log CFU(1.9至2.6)低于单独使用P时的(4.0)。在感染菌株1达24小时然后接受9天治疗的兔子中,与单独使用P(4.9)相比,每种联合用药的log CFU均降低(2.0至2.3)。对于菌株2,P加G或Si时的log CFU(1.5和2.5)低于单独使用P或P加S时的(4.5和4.1)。在感染菌株1达3天然后接受7天治疗的兔子中,每种联合用药的log CFU为4.1至5.5,单独使用P时为6.7。对于菌株2,P加G或Si时的log CFU为4.0,而单独使用P或P加S时分别为6.4和6.7。这些研究表明,对于对S敏感的肠球菌,或者由对S耐药的肠球菌引起的早期(感染6小时)心内膜炎,这三种抗生素联合用药之间差异不大。在由对S耐药的肠球菌引起的更严重(感染24小时或3天)的心内膜炎中,P加G和P加Si比P加S有很大优势。