• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗服务提供者(医生)的职位。

The position of the providers--physicians.

作者信息

Loschen D

机构信息

Nebraska Medical Association, York 68467.

出版信息

Nebr Med J. 1994 Mar;79(3):74-7.

PMID:8196815
Abstract

As the AMA has been on the cutting edge in discussions of health care reform nationally, so the NMA has been intimately involved in such discussions in Nebraska. As the "umbrella" organizations for physicians nationally and statewide, respectively, the AMA and NMA recognize that there is no easy and painless solution to the crisis. Indeed, there is still sharp division of opinion among medical specialty societies regarding even the most fundamental issues of health care reform. From a state perspective, the NMA pledges to continue to work with other health care organizations, insurance organizations, and governmental entities to identify the health care reform measures that best suit the needs of the citizens of Nebraska, within the constraints that national health care reform will allow for individual state initiatives. While physicians of Nebraska want a "place at the table" to discuss health care reform, it will be the challenge for the NMA to assure that physicians and the patients they serve do not become "part of the meal".

摘要

美国医学协会(AMA)在全国范围内关于医疗保健改革的讨论中一直处于前沿,内布拉斯加州医学协会(NMA)也同样密切参与了该州的此类讨论。作为全国和全州医生的“伞式”组织,AMA和NMA认识到,这场危机没有轻松无痛的解决方案。事实上,即使在医疗保健改革最基本的问题上,医学专业协会之间仍存在尖锐的意见分歧。从州的角度来看,NMA承诺继续与其他医疗保健组织、保险组织和政府实体合作,在国家医疗保健改革允许各州采取主动行动的限制范围内,确定最适合内布拉斯加州公民需求的医疗保健改革措施。虽然内布拉斯加州的医生希望在讨论医疗保健改革时有一席之地,但对NMA来说,确保医生及其服务的患者不会成为“盘中餐”将是一项挑战。

相似文献

1
The position of the providers--physicians.医疗服务提供者(医生)的职位。
Nebr Med J. 1994 Mar;79(3):74-7.
2
AMA candidate Tim Flaherty, MD, tackles issues facing physicians. Interview by Shari Hamilton.
Wis Med J. 1994 Mar;93(3):129-35.
3
The role of physicians and medical organizations in the development, analysis, and implementation of health care policy.医生和医疗组织在医疗保健政策的制定、分析和实施中的作用。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Jul;18(3):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.01.006.
4
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
5
Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?法定上限:是对医疗事故保险危机的非自愿贡献,还是获得可负担医疗保健的合理机制?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1993 Spring;9:337-75.
6
Health care delivery system reform: accountable care organizations.医疗保健提供系统改革: accountable care organizations(可直译为“ accountable care组织”,通常译为“ accountable care组织”或“ 负责医疗组织” ) 。 (注:这里的 accountable care organizations是医疗领域的一个特定概念,在实际应用中可能需要根据具体语境进一步准确表述,比如在我国医疗体系语境下可能还需要进一步解释说明。)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 8;54(11):985-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.014.
7
Report 59 of the AMA Board of Trustees (A-96). Physician-assisted suicide. Reference Committee on Amendments to Constitution and Bylaws.美国医学协会理事会第59号报告(A - 96)。医师协助自杀。宪法及章程修订参考委员会。
J Okla State Med Assoc. 1996 Aug;89(8):281-93.
8
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
10
The choice is ours.选择权在我们手中。
Conn Med. 1993 Jan;57(1):19-23.