前列腺癌试验的设计与分析。
Design and analysis of prostate cancer trials.
作者信息
Sylvester R
机构信息
Eortc Data Center, Brussels, Belgium.
出版信息
Acta Urol Belg. 1994 Apr;62(1):23-9.
PMID:8197926
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of various statistical concepts related to the design and analysis of prostate cancer trials: the need for randomization, stratification for prognostic factors, sample size determination, trial objectives, the choice of a control group, patient entry criteria, the number of treatments to be compared, the choice of endpoints, analysis by the intent to treat principle, interim statistical analysis and early stopping rule, and subgroup analyses.
摘要
本文概述了与前列腺癌试验的设计和分析相关的各种统计概念
随机化的必要性、预后因素的分层、样本量的确定、试验目的、对照组的选择、患者入选标准、待比较的治疗方法数量、终点的选择、按意向性分析原则进行分析、期中统计分析和提前终止规则，以及亚组分析。
相似文献
1
Design and analysis of prostate cancer trials.
Acta Urol Belg. 1994 Apr;62(1):23-9.
2
Statistical considerations for the design and analysis of Phase III clinical trials in prostate cancer.
Urol Oncol. 2008 May-Jun;26(3):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.11.007. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
3
Performance of adaptive sample size adjustment with respect to stopping criteria and time of interim analysis.
Stat Med. 2007 Mar 30;26(7):1450-61. doi: 10.1002/sim.2652.
4
Prognostic factors for randomization and stratification and endpoints for the evaluation of trials.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;269:275-87.
5
Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4450-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.197.
6
Interim analyses in 2 x 2 crossover trials.
Biometrics. 1995 Sep;51(3):932-45.
7
Designing for cancer clinical trials: selection of prognostic factors.
Cancer Treat Rep. 1980 Feb-Mar;64(2-3):499-502.
8
A general statistical principle for changing a design any time during the course of a trial.
Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30;23(16):2497-508. doi: 10.1002/sim.1852.
9
Assessment of futility in clinical trials.
Pharm Stat. 2006 Oct-Dec;5(4):273-81. doi: 10.1002/pst.216.
10
Incorporating intermediate binary responses into interim analyses of clinical trials: a comparison of four methods.
Stat Med. 2008 May 10;27(10):1646-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.3046.
Zotero 插件