Moler F W, Custer J R, Bartlett R H, Palmisano J M, Akingbola O, Taylor R P, Maxvold N J
Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0718.
J Pediatr. 1994 Jun;124(6):875-80. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83174-9.
The purpose of this study was to examine our recent experience with children who had acute respiratory failure managed with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) from 1991 to 1993, to determine whether a change in survival rate had occurred in comparison with our previous experience.
Historic and prospective cohort study.
A tertiary pediatric referral center.
All non-neonatal pediatric patients treated with ECLS for severe, life-threatening respiratory failure were examined. Overall, 25 patients have been managed with this life-support technique in the past 28 months. Eighty-four percent (21/25) were transferred to our medical center because of failure of conventional mechanical ventilation therapy. Descriptive data of the recent cohort were as follows (mean +/- SD): age 60 +/- 75 months, weight 23.6 +/- 24.8 kg, and male gender 44%. Duration of intubation before ECLS was 5.8 +/- 2.7 days. Arterial blood gas values and ventilator settings immediately before ECLS were as follows: fraction of inspired oxygen, 0.98 +/- 0.08; mean airway pressure, 21.6 +/- 6.2 cm H2O; peak inspiratory pressure, 45.5 +/- 9.6 cm H2O; positive end-expiratory pressure, 11.0 +/- 4.3 cm H2O; partial pressure of oxygen (arterial), 56 +/- 20 mm Hg (7.4 +/- 2.7 kilopascals); partial pressure of carbon dioxide (arterial), 46 +/- 17 mm Hg (6.1 +/- 2.3 kPa); and estimated alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference, 572 +/- 81 mm Hg (76.3 +/- 10.8 kPa). Mean duration of ECLS was 373 +/- 259 hours. Of 25 recently treated patients, 22 (88%) survived their life-threatening respiratory illness to be discharged home; this represented a statistically improved survival rate in comparison with the 58% survival rate previously reported by us for similar patients (p < 0.05). Comparisons of arterial blood gas and mechanical ventilation-related variables measured 24 hours before and again immediately before bypass were similar in the two cohorts with the exception of higher mean partial pressure of carbon dioxide (arterial) 24 hours before bypass in the recent treatment group. For our entire experience, younger age groups had greater survival rates; 100% of infants less than 1 year of age survived.
Treatment with ECLS is an evolving pulmonary rescue therapy with an 88% survival rate in our recent experience. The survival rate has improved to levels that may not greatly improve in the near future, especially for patients less than 1 year of age. Better patient selection or improved management strategies or both may be responsible for the improved patient outcome.
本研究旨在探讨我们1991年至1993年期间对采用体外生命支持(ECLS)治疗急性呼吸衰竭儿童的近期经验,以确定与我们之前的经验相比生存率是否发生了变化。
历史性和前瞻性队列研究。
一家三级儿科转诊中心。
所有接受ECLS治疗严重、危及生命的呼吸衰竭的非新生儿儿科患者均接受检查。在过去28个月中,共有25例患者采用了这种生命支持技术。84%(21/25)因传统机械通气治疗失败而转入我们的医疗中心。近期队列的描述性数据如下(均值±标准差):年龄60±75个月,体重23.6±24.8千克,男性占44%。ECLS前插管时间为5.8±2.7天。ECLS前即刻的动脉血气值和呼吸机设置如下:吸入氧分数0.98±0.08;平均气道压21.6±6.2厘米水柱;吸气峰压45.5±9.6厘米水柱;呼气末正压11.0±4.3厘米水柱;动脉血氧分压56±20毫米汞柱(7.4±2.7千帕);动脉血二氧化碳分压46±17毫米汞柱(6.1±2.3千帕);估计肺泡-动脉氧分压差572±81毫米汞柱(76.3±10.8千帕)。ECLS的平均持续时间为373±259小时。在最近治疗的25例患者中,22例(88%)从危及生命的呼吸疾病中存活并出院;与我们之前报道的类似患者58%的生存率相比,这代表了统计学上生存率的提高(p<0.05)。除了近期治疗组在体外循环前24小时动脉血二氧化碳分压均值较高外,两个队列在体外循环前24小时和即将进行体外循环前即刻测量的动脉血气和机械通气相关变量的比较相似。就我们的整体经验而言,年龄较小的组生存率更高;1岁以下婴儿的生存率为100%。
在我们近期的经验中,ECLS治疗是一种不断发展的肺部抢救疗法,生存率为88%。生存率已提高到近期可能不会有太大改善的水平,尤其是对于1岁以下的患者。更好的患者选择或改进的管理策略或两者兼而有之可能是患者预后改善的原因。