• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fisher's game with the devil.

作者信息

Senn S

机构信息

Medicines and Clinical Development Department, Pharmaceuticals Division, CIBA Ltd., Basle, Switzerland.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1994 Feb 15;13(3):217-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130305.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780130305
PMID:8202650
Abstract

The publication of Fisher's correspondence on statistics has shed new light on his views on randomization. Quotations from this correspondence and from other works of Fisher are used to illustrate the role of randomization in clinical trials. It is concluded that Fisher's views not only are coherent but, despite having been developed over 60 years ago and with particular reference to agricultural experiments, are still relevant to the planning and analysis of clinical trials today.

摘要

相似文献

1
Fisher's game with the devil.
Stat Med. 1994 Feb 15;13(3):217-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130305.
2
R. A. Fisher and his advocacy of randomization.罗纳德·艾尔默·费希尔及其对随机化的倡导。
J Hist Biol. 2007 Summer;40(2):295-325. doi: 10.1007/s10739-006-9119-z.
3
Fisher's randomization test and Darwin's data -- a footnote to the history of statistics.
Math Biosci. 2002 Nov-Dec;180:23-8. doi: 10.1016/s0025-5564(02)00123-2.
4
The value of randomization and control in clinical trials.临床试验中随机化和对照的价值。
Stat Med. 1993 Aug;12(15-16):1421-31; discussion 1433-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121508.
5
Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中随机化与盲法的实际问题。
Arthroscopy. 2003 Nov;19(9):1000-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.023.
6
Controversies concerning randomization and additivity in clinical trials.关于临床试验中随机化和可加性的争议。
Stat Med. 2004 Dec 30;23(24):3729-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.2074.
7
Misuse of randomization: a review of Chinese randomized trials of herbal medicines for chronic hepatitis B.随机化的误用：对中国慢性乙型肝炎草药随机试验的综述
Am J Chin Med. 2002;30(1):173-6. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X0200017X.
8
Randomization tests in clinical trials with multiple imputation for handling missing data.临床试验中缺失数据处理的随机化检验与多重插补
J Biopharm Stat. 2022 May 4;32(3):441-449. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2080695. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
9
A theoretical analysis showed that blinding cannot eliminate potential for bias associated with beliefs about allocation in randomized clinical trials.一项理论分析表明，在随机临床试验中，盲法无法消除与分配相关信念所带来的潜在偏倚可能性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):667-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.001.
10
A note on response-adaptive randomization.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jan;40:240. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomization Does Not Help Much, Comparability Does.随机化作用不大，可比性才重要。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0132102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132102. eCollection 2015.