Nitenberg A, Geschwind H, Herreman F
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1976 Apr;69(4):385-93.
It is well known that the left ventricular volume, as measured by the cineangiographic method, decreases during the phase of isometric contraction. What is more, the cardiac index and the ejection fraction measured by this method are definitely larger than those derived from dilution methods. These discrepancies can be explained by movements of the mitral valve during the phases of isometric contraction and relaxation. The systolic ejection volume (SEV) was measured by three different methods: 1. End-diastolic volume (EDV) -end-systolic volume (ESV) ; 2. EDV - pre-filling volume (PFV) ; 3. Pre-ejection volume (PEV) - ESV. It has emerged that the results given by the methods (2) and (3) correspond closely, and differ significantly from those given by method (1); they are also close to those obtained by the dilution method. This difference seems to arise from the fact that the movements of the mitral valve during the phase of isometric relaxation are diametrically opposite to those which occur during isometric contraction; thus, when the values EDV-ESV are used in the calculation of SEV, an overestimate is made because the mitral valve is not to be found in the same position within the ventricular cavity for both values.
众所周知,通过心血管造影法测量的左心室容积在等容收缩期会减小。此外,用这种方法测得的心脏指数和射血分数肯定比用稀释法得出的数值要大。这些差异可以用二尖瓣在等容收缩期和舒张期的运动来解释。用三种不同方法测量了收缩期射血容积(SEV):1. 舒张末期容积(EDV)-收缩末期容积(ESV);2. EDV-预充盈容积(PFV);3. 射血前期容积(PEV)-ESV。结果显示,方法(2)和(3)得出的结果非常接近,与方法(1)的结果有显著差异;它们也与稀释法得到的结果相近。这种差异似乎源于等容舒张期二尖瓣的运动与等容收缩期的运动完全相反;因此,当用EDV-ESV的值来计算SEV时,会出现高估,因为这两个值对应的二尖瓣在心室腔内的位置并不相同。